If longevity in Australia is a basis for cultural priority, why shouldn't the descendants of First Fleeters assert priority over all those who followed them?
There is another reason why welcome to country ceremonies should be abandoned: they are actually not part of Aboriginal culture at all, but were invented by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley to welcome a group of MÄoris in 1976. Australia's first governor, Captain Arthur Phillip, could never have witnessed a welcome to country ceremony in 1788 because they did not exist at that time.
Those who support welcome to country ceremonies are largely the same people who advocated for a yes vote for the Voice or repeat slogans such as "always was, always will be". They are simply out of step with mainstream opinion; today's Australians are not responsible for what occurred long before they were born and will not be held liable for it.
Advertisement
And while there are genuine concerns at the differences in health and education between Aborigines in remote areas and other Australians, it is perfectly obvious to them that welcome to country ceremonies will not close the gap. Moreover, there are other Australians also missing out who are not Aboriginal.
Australians are kind-hearted and generous, and have always supported assistance on the basis of need. But having Aborigines welcome us to our own country is simply un-Australian.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
35 posts so far.