Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

I’m not signing Australian lawyers’ open letter concerning Gaza

By David Singer - posted Tuesday, 14 November 2023


1012 Australian barristers, lawyers and legal academics have so far signed a nine-page letter - including 89 footnotes (Australian Letter) - requesting Australia use its influence to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and the West Bank - which I won't be signing.

The Australian Letter dated 3 November 2023 acknowledges it is based on a similar letter signed by English lawyers dated 26 October 2023 (English Letter).

Advertisement

Both letters fail to disclose material facts - whilst the Australian Letter also deliberately omits material facts contained in the English letter:

1. Both letters state:

In the morning hours of 7 October 2023, Hamas fired a barrage of thousands of rockets from Gaza into Israeli territory, before breaching the security barrier surrounding Gaza in multiple locations.

Neither letter states that the firing of each of these thousands of rockets indiscriminately into Israeli population centers constituted a war crime.

Why?

2. Both letters state:

Advertisement

1,400 Israelis and other nationals were killed on and after 7 October 2023, according to figures provided by the Israeli Ministry of Health, most of them civilians4 including multiple members of the same family, women and at least 31 children.There are reports of mutilation

No footnote provided for "reports of mutilation" seems to be intentional – given this Guardian Report dated 24 October was readily available:

Israeli authorities have shown harrowing footage of killings and mutilations during Hamas's rampage in southern Israel on 7 October.

The government showed the 43-minute compilation in a private screening for dozens of foreign journalists at a military base in Tel Aviv on Monday to counter what it said were attempts to deny or downplay the extent of the atrocities.

The footage, captured by security cameras, body cameras worn by the Hamas attackers, vehicle dashboard cameras, social media accounts and videos from mobile phones, left some reporters in tears. The material included the killing of children and decapitation of some victims.

Were these 1012 Lawyers aware that such horrific atrocities had been carried out before signing this letter?

Would these 1012 signatories have signed this letter if they realised this could be construed as giving their support for a ceasefire that would also spare the lives of these sub-human monsters from Gaza – enabling them to continue attempting to repeat these vile crimes against humanity?

3. The English Letter recorded 299 Israelis being critically or seriously wounded and 279 people hospitalized for traumatic stress.

These statistics were deleted in the Australian Letter.

Why?

4. The English Letter states that "hundreds of thousands of Israelis" fled or were evacuated. The Australian Letter states "thousands of Israelis".

Why?

5. The Australian Letter omits this statement contained in the English Letter:

As stated by the UN Secretary General, "Nothing can justify the deliberate killing, injuring and kidnapping of civilians – or the launching of rockets against civilian targets

Why?

6. Definitions of ambiguous terms used such as "Palestinians", "Palestine" and "State of Palestine" have been omitted.

The Australian Letter additionally calls for:

... the Australian Government to work toward ending Israel's illegal permanent occupation of Palestine, as per the September 2022 findings of the Permanent United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Israel Palestine Conflict.

Laughable: Those findings were made without any consideration of Article 6 of the Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the United Nations Charter which legally authorised the Jewish People to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in that area of Palestine west of the Jordan River.

Have any of these 1012 lawyers even heard of these pillars of international law that still apply today?

This legal practitioner with 63 years of experience will certainly not be signing this misleading and deceptive letter.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Singer is an Australian Lawyer, a Foundation Member of the International Analyst Network and Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International - an organisation calling for sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza to be allocated between Israel and Jordan as the two successor States to the Mandate for Palestine. Previous articles written by him can be found at www.jordanispalestine.blogspot.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Singer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy