Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How to prevent another scientific great leap forward

By Graham Young - posted Monday, 21 August 2023


We paid the price

The original lockdown strategy was sold to us as “flattening the curve,” which was supposed to take two weeks or so.

After a month or more, it became evident that politicians were so risk averse they had decided to “eliminate” the virus, even though this had never been done with any virus before in history.

Once embarked on this strategy, they either had to admit failure or find a way of deflecting attention to something else, which is where vaccines came in. But we now know that the vaccines could not eliminate the virus, and as my opening paragraphs show, weren’t even designed to stop transmission.

Advertisement

After locking Australia down off and on for a year and spending somewhere around $800 billion, it is now obvious that the original focused protection strategy was the right one. Masks, lockdowns, mass vaccination, vaccine mandates, contact tracing and check-in apps achieved little but terrorise the community and weaken the economy.

There were some natural experiments where jurisdictions stuck with focused protection—Sweden was one.

In the United States, we have a good comparison between Florida, where after initial lockdowns, Governor Ron De Santis took a liberal approach, and California, where Governor Gavin Newsome took an authoritarian one.

Excess deaths are the best measure of the cost as they take into account not just COVID deaths but all deaths, whether caused by COVID or the COVID measures.

On this metric, Sweden comes out fairly close to its neighbours, as the graph below comparing it with Denmark illustrates.

Excess deaths: Sweden vs. Denmark. (Our World In Data)
Excess deaths: Sweden vs. Denmark. (Our World In Data)
Advertisement

On the same measure, a recent study in the Lancet said that Florida outperformed California significantly, adjusting for sociodemographic factors in the population.

Learn from the mistakes

How do we stop this from repeating itself, particularly as those responsible for this debacle seem to be keen to see the next pandemic arrive and are suggesting the same solutions?

The first thing should be to make the decision-making teams more diverse in terms of their expertise.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

This article was first published in the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy