Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Star Wars or Hobbiton: where does Australia stand on nuclear?

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 25 May 2023


The reason for this is two-fold-concern about climate change coupled with the unravelling of the renewable energy industry's pitch that wind and solar can save the day.

There are two strands to climate change thought. One is the Star Wars strand, and the other is the Hobbiton one.

The Star Wars strand contains the techno-optimists who see climate change as being just another challenge in man's irresistible rise to the stars and beyond.

Advertisement

The Hobbiton strand contains the nostalgic romantics, yearning for a simpler, less material, and more natural life.

The latter has so far prevailed, which is not surprising because this is where the majority of deep-green environmentalists are. But the reality, in the shape of mankind's desire to maintain and improve living standards, is colliding with it.

Promises were made that wind and solar were "green, clean, and cheap," but long experience with them shows this trifecta to be a lie.

So-called renewable technologies involve the mining of huge amounts of earth to produce the minerals they need; pose enormous challenges in disposing of the turbines and panels when they are finished; and, as power prices climb inexorably higher, they can no longer claim to be cheap.

The cost challenges are immense.

Wind and solar are intermittent and need to be backed up by storage and also by alternative technologies.

Advertisement

This necessitates a massively enlarged network and capacity that is two or more times what is needed sitting idle most of the time.

Indeed, as I write, there is virtually no usable wind over South Australia, Victoria, and New South Wales (NSW).

When I wrote this a quick look at the synoptic chart showed that there was hardly any pressure gradient over these areas to generate wind and that this was forecast to continue for at least another seven days. So far the forecast has been right.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

A version of this article was first published in the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy