Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Time for Australia to have a conversation about nuclear energy

By Ted O'Brien - posted Wednesday, 7 December 2022


As the government continues to demonise gas and encourage the premature closure of coal-fired power stations, the crisis will only deepen.

Recent announcements will see about 20GW of capacity shut down by 2035.

That's about 80 per cent of baseload generation gone from the National Electricity Market – with no guarantee of a replacement in time.

Advertisement

Other countries also face serious energy problems, but they are extending the life of their baseload power plants or restarting mothballed ones as we plan to blow ours up. As other nations are expanding their nuclear fleets or introducing nuclear energy, our government doesn't even want to talk about it.

Second, there's climate change. Nuclear energy is the cleanest industrial-scale source of energy generation the world has ever seen.

Its energy density is unparalleled and the fact it produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation explains why so many like-minded nations see it playing such a big role in their plans to reduce emissions.

The International Panel on Climate Change considers nuclear energy a "mitigating technology" for climate change.

All four IPCC pathways to achieve the goal of limiting the temperature rise to 1.5C include nuclear energy.

The United Nations' Envoy on Climate Action and Finance claims to have never seen a credible transition strategy that did not include nuclear.

Advertisement

And the US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, John Kerry, said at COP27 last month: "We don't get to net zero by 2050 without nuclear power in the mix."

Third, the advances in nuclear technology can't be ignored. Not only does nuclear offer low-cost and consistent 24/7 electricity, but it also has the capability to "load-follow", ramping up and down to accommodate the volatility of weather-dependent renewables.

It has also proven to be the world's safest source of energy production. When I chaired a parliamentary inquiry into nuclear energy in the last term of government, the biggest lesson I learnt was the importance of a social licence; community acceptance is a prerequisite for nuclear energy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published in The Australian.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ted O'Brien is the Federal Member for Fairfax, and the Shadow Minister for Climate Change and Energy.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ted O'Brien
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy