Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is development aid still serving the Australian national interest?

By Jeffrey Wall - posted Friday, 2 December 2022


A key to Wafi going ahead is affordable and reliable power. Ramu 2 cannot deliver that!!

The way China is exercising a greater presence despite reducing aid surely requires Canberra to take notice.

Let me use PNG as an example. We currently give PNG about $600 million a year in development assistance. It is spread between 50 and 100 projects, diminishing its effectiveness. And much of the aid is delivered by contractors resulting in upwards of 50 per cent of our aid being "boomerang aid" meaning it never even gets to Papua New Guinea!!

Advertisement

The Albanese Government needs to urgently review our whole approach to engaging with our neighbours. By any measure it is just ineffective. It has, in my view, outlived its effectiveness.

That review needs to look at what China is doing.... because it is working.

First it needs to engage the private sector more fully in its engagement. It can do so effectively by helping fund joint ventures between Australian and PNG companies.

I would allocate half the existing aid budget to joint ventures that promote the PNG private sector and boost trade.

It might also include Australia buying more of PNG's produce, notably coffee and cocoa, and seafood. The package could also subsidise freight to Australia and assistance with plantation rehabilitation and other measures to improve productivity.

China is talking about taking more of PNGs coffee production. But it would be at China's price. We should get in first.

Advertisement

Secondly, half the aid budget should be made available to the NGO sector and Christian churches. That will reduce the number of DFAT bureaucrats!

The NGOs and churches are well placed to partner with PNG counterparts to deliver programs that cut out red tape and really benefit the 10 million people of PNG.

I well recall the visit to PNG by Prime Minister Rudd over a decade ago, The Grand Chief asked his office to seek my view on where PM Rudd should be taken when in PNG. I suggested he be taken to Goroka where the late Kela Smith was Governor.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeffrey Wall CSM CBE is a Brisbane Political Consultant and has served as Advisor to the PNG Foreign Minister, Sir Rabbie Namaliu – Prime Minister 1988-1992 and Speaker 1994-1997.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeffrey Wall

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy