Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The federal government must back Australian companies and investors operating in the South Pacific

By Jeffrey Wall - posted Friday, 11 November 2022


It has never been easy for Australian companies, and investors, to operate in our immediate region of the South Pacific.

Operating in the region can be very profitable, but there are also risks associated with it, especially when it comes to developing major resource projects, such as minerals and gas.

Papua New Guinea remains the major destination of our investment and business activity. The fact we were the colonial power probably just increases the challenges.

Advertisement

In recent years the challenges in PNG and the region have increased massively as a result of the heavy-handed intervention of China across the region.

Australia's response generally has been to increase development assistance, also known as aid and quite frankly, in terms of slowing China's growth and influence, it's a failed response.

It has especially failed because China has switched its priorities in the region. It has reduced untied aid simply because it is achieving the outcomes it seeks without aid.

China exerts it's influence through a mixture of trade, tied loans, the lobbying of politicians and senior officials, as well as direct engagement with the boards of government-owned corporations.

The key feature of China's tied loans is its insistence that all work, such as roads and communications, be undertaken by Chinese companies, and using Chinese skilled and unskilled workers.

The requirements on Australian companies, especially operating in PNG, to train Papua New Guineans, acquire local partners and meet reasonably onerous visa and work permit requirements are considerable. Almost without exception Chinese companies can get around these requirements, and not only in PNG.

Advertisement

That brings me to how Australia can support our companies, and investors and shareholders, in our region.

The history is far from encouraging.

The worst example occurred in the Solomon Islands a few years ago.

A Brisbane-based mining company had a licence to develop a mine in the Solomon Islands. The Solomons Mining Minister, without proper justification, suddenly cancelled the licence. No compensation was offered.

The licence was subsequently given to a Chinese company.

The Australian Government protested, lashing the decision and the SI Government with a wet lettuce!

It had absolutely zero effect .and that was even before China massively extended its influence over the SI Government.

The next major project in the region is unquestionably the Wafi-Golpu mine in PNG's Morobe Province.

The negotiation process for the mine's development has been long and complex. There are a number of significant environmental issues, landowner disputes and differences between the national and provincial governments.

It would seem most have been resolved, but the joint venture will pay a heavy price for getting its way on tailings disposal. It insists on deep sea disposal. The provincial government was opposed to that. It seems to have given way but has extracted a high price.

The Marape Government wants a 30 per cent equity in the project.

The question is how will the National Government pay for its equity.

There are reports China is prepared to lend the PNG Government the funds to finance its equity.

The mine developers are Newcrest, an Australian company with an excellent record in PNG, and Harmony, which has South African Origin, but it is also a mining investor in Australia.

The Australian Government needs to focus on ensuring the mine gets developed and does so without Chinese involvement.

If China funded the PNG Government equity there would be conditions attached. One would almost certainly be that the mine would have to take its electricity from the Ramu Two hydro scheme being funded by a large Chinese loan with construction contracts already awarded to a major Chinese state-owned construction company.

The Australian Government needs to urgently discuss with the PNG Government, and the mine JV partners, how to best finance the PNG Government equity.

The capacity of the government to borrow on its own is questionable.

The mine will employ a significant number of Australian workers and contractors.

It will enhance the stability and growth of the PNG economy at a time when it is desperately needed.

Canberra needs to get a move on and work with the parties to get the project under way.

It also needs to consider how best to keep China out of it.

This is a very good project. It is large, it's capacity to provide long term benefits to Papua New Guinea is beyond question.

It demands Canberra's urgent attention to strengthen the economic base of our neighbour and protect the Australian national interest.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeffrey Wall CSM CBE is a Brisbane Political Consultant and has served as Advisor to the PNG Foreign Minister, Sir Rabbie Namaliu – Prime Minister 1988-1992 and Speaker 1994-1997.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeffrey Wall

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy