Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The White Elephant Award goes to...Snowy Hydro 2.0

By Tristan Prasser - posted Monday, 5 September 2022


 Q: How does Malcolm Turnbull turn $2 billion into $10 billion?
A: Snowy Hydro 2.0

This month's White Elephant Award goes to the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project after another reported cost blow out of $2.2 billion dollars, with further delays expected to add the current 18 months the project is behind schedule. These delays have already pushed the start date well beyond the original 2025 date. Adding further drama to the project has been the sudden resignation of CEO Paul Broad.

Just to remind readers - white elephant projects are those that cost more than promised, deliver less benefits than projected, and continue to be a drain on the public purse.

Advertisement

Malcolm's Grand Plan

Snowy 2.0 was announced in 2017 by then Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull as the cornerstone project to enable Australia to transition to a renewable (wind and solar) future, while promising to deliver a more affordable and reliable energy system, generate jobs and grow the economy. It would be the 'battery' for the National Energy Market (NEM).

It was spruiked at the time as a great nation-building project, that evoked the nostalgia of the original Snowy Hydro Scheme that took 23 years to complete from 1949 to 1974.

The trouble is, whenever that term "nation-building" is used in the Australian context - a term that rolls off the tongue far too easily for many a politician- it is somewhat hard not to just yell "white elephant". Sometimes reality can really feel like an episode of Utopia.

What is Snowy 2.0?

In essence, Snowy 2.0 is a pumped-hydro project that revives an old plan to connect two reservoirs in the northern part of the Kosciuszko National Park - Tantangara and Talbingo. Using excess electricity generated from solar and wind, water will be pumped from Talbingo to Tantangara. Then in times of less wind or solar availability, water will be released from Tantangara down the range, passing through hydroelectric turbines to generate electricity.

As stated on the Snowy 2.0 website:

Snowy 2.0 will provide an additional 2,000 megawatts of dispatchable, on-demand generating capacity and approximately 350,000 megawatt hours of large-scale storage to the National Electricity Market. To provide context, this is enough energy storage to power three million homes over the course of a week.

Advertisement

Simple, right? But as always, the devil is in the detail.

The difficulty is that the two reservoirs are a fair distance apart, requiring 27 km of pipelines to link the two. To add further complexity, the power station will need to be installed 850m underground within the mountain range, requiring tonnes upon tonnes of earth and rock to be excavated. Not to mention the upgrading of transmission that is required.

This is where engineering complexity meets economic realities.

Costs, costs and more costs

That the whole Snowy 2.0 project was decided upon in about two weeks as revealed in Senate estimates in 2018 - from Snowy Hydro pitching the concept to the then Prime Minister's Office, to it being announced two weeks later by Turnbull - was never going to bode well for the project. Rushed decision making is one of the prerequisites for white elephant projects to occur.

Snowy 2.0 was originally announced in 2017 with an estimated $2 billion price tag by PM Turnbull and with a completion timeframe of 4 years.

This was in addition to the $6 billion the Commonwealth spent to take full ownership of Snowy Hydro Limited buying out the shares of the New South Wales and Victorian Governments.

The initial feasibility study provided a base range of $3.8 billion to $4.5 billion, though the economic analysis had been excluded from the public facing document.

Then in 2019 it was revealed by the winning contractor that Snowy 2.0's official cost came in at $5.1 billion, covering tunnel and power station construction costs. This did not include costs for upgrading existing and building new transmission infrastructure.

Currently, the total cost of Snowy 2.0 is expected to exceed an eyewatering $10 billion for construction and transmission infrastructure. And is expected to be completed in the late 2020s, at the earliest.

There is no doubt that the project will end up costing billions upon billions more than that. And it will most likely face further delays.

Where to from here?

Further delays to the project are set to have implications for the future of the NEM and its ability to absorb greater amounts of renewable wind and solar generation in the years ahead. That could prove problematic for a Commonwealth government promising to achieve 82 per renewable share of the NEM by 2030. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) is already warning of future supply constraints should there be more delays, adding further pressure as aging coal-fired generators like Eraring exit the market before the end of the decade.

Like the original Snowy Hydro Scheme, there remains questions over the feasibility of the project and its ultimate benefits - both economic and environmental - that have never been adequately addressed.

Indeed, the original Snowy Hydro Scheme is seen by some like Dr Richard Evans as Australia's Great White Elephant - an epic engineering feat, but a white elephant nevertheless. And it seems Snowy 2.0 is well on its way on achieving such epic status - perhaps Australia's Great White Elephant 2.0.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published on Policy Insights.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tristan Prasser is co-editor and contributor for Urban Source. He is a graduate of UQ and ANU and has worked previously in the Queensland State Government and higher education sector in Australia and the UK. He has a keen interest in energy and urban policy and advocates the use of nuclear power in Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tristan Prasser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tristan Prasser
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy