Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

When it comes to housing policy, why aren’t we talking about building more homes?

By Natalie Rayment - posted Thursday, 26 May 2022


YIMBY Qld has long been concerned with the role restrictive planning and zoning play in housing unaffordability and we are not alone.

Brendan Coates, Economic Policy Program Director at Grattan Institute and co-author of the submission told ABC News that "We won't succeed on housing affordability until we start tackling the hard choices, which is boosting supply by reforming planning rules to make it easier to build housing in the major cities."

We believe urgent Federally supported/driven Planning reform is needed in many Australian cities and regions to increase opportunities for smaller homes, greater housing choices and reduce the time and cost of obtaining housing approvals. This could include things like reducing minimum lot sizes for new houses, removing minimum car parking requirements for new apartments close to rail, metro and ferries, and increasing scope for medium-density development in their cities' middle ring suburbs. These changes could make housing more affordable to buy and rent, not just because greater density means greater supply, but also because smaller houses are less expensive than larger ones. Less land component per home means less expensive homes. The opportunity to rent out your granny flat on the open market may help someone step up into home ownership or cover their mortgage as interest rates rise.

Advertisement

Politicians do not have the political will to properly address the supply side of housing as they fear devaluing homes already owned in the market, hence wreaking havoc on their re-election prospects. This, of course, does not need to be the case as a properly set up body to scientifically monitor the supply and demand equation will ensure that values continue to increase modestly with inflation.

To give them their due, both major parties have pledged funding which will go towards creating new social housing to address the supply side of the equation. However, reforming planning and zoning rules would create more systemic and impactful change.

Although planning and zoning is usually a local or state issue, the Federal Government can also play a part. Several sources have suggested the Federal Government provide a monetary incentive for other levels of government to loosen constraints on planning and zoning.

The Grattan Institute recommends incentivising State and Territory governments to reform land-use planning rules through payments "based on clear and achievable targets" linked to housing outcomes.

Shane Wright, senior economics correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald suggested a "'supply increase' bonus" for local councils to change planning laws to increase the number of homes available in their areas.

Alternatively, the Australian Government could follow the example set by our Kiwi cousins and take direct action on planning laws.

Advertisement

Last December, the Government of New Zealand passed legislation with bipartisan support to boost housing supply in the country's five most populous cities. The Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) bill allows up to three three-storey dwellings on a single lot by right. An early estimate from Pricewaterhouse Coopers suggests that this could add as many as 105,000 extra homes in a country facing a similar affordability crisis. Similar reforms have swept major US States in recent years, strongly supported by the YIMBY movement.

If we are serious that housing is a human right, or that home ownership should be an attainable goal for all Australians regardless of how much they earn or who their parents are, simply giving people more money to spend is not going cut it. We need reform to ensure that there are enough homes to go around.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Natalie Rayment is a town planner and co-founder of YIIMBY Qld.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Natalie Rayment

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy