Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia's military intelligence should not become a political football

By Gary Brown - posted Tuesday, 4 May 2004


But bear in mind that such people would be powerless without political support. This was forthcoming from the Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating and early Howard governments. Not until Suharto's regime succumbed to the Asian economic crisis of the late nineties, did the Howard Government execute a sudden backflip on East Timor.

In any event we can no longer afford either continued intelligence self-censorship or a "pro-anybody" lobby. In our current strategic environment, intelligence collation and assessment are far more important in a day-to-day sense than in the deadly rituals of the Cold War. Good intelligence work in the field, or by capable analysts in Canberra like Lt-Col Collins, cannot now be compromised by the imposition of political priorities. This, it seems likely, has already happened. The cost has been Australia's involvement in an unsanctioned war of conquest and our (now apparently indefinite) embroilment in the post-war Iraqi morass.

Nor can we afford the quality of intelligence outcomes so tellingly listed by Lt-Col Collins. The "putrefaction" of our intelligence assessment and advice processes must end now or we could pay a heavy price. Our next failure might be televised direct from the Harbour Bridge, Parliament House or the Melbourne Cricket Ground.

Advertisement

In response to the Iraq fiasco, the Prime Minister set up an inquiry - not open, not a Royal Commission - under Mr Phillip Flood, former head of Foreign Affairs and a former Australian Ambassador to Jakarta. This inquiry is insufficient; not only might there be an appearance of a club member investigating the club, but it lacks the extensive powers and ability to protect witnesses held by Royal Commissions. Lt-Col Collins is right: only a Royal Commission and that soon, will serve.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Ian Miller.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Until June 2002 Gary Brown was a Defence Advisor with the Parliamentary Information and Research Service at Parliament House, Canberra, where he provided confidential advice and research at request to members and staffs of all parties and Parliamentary committees, and produced regular publications on a wide range of defence issues. Many are available at here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gary Brown
Related Links
Stratwise Consulting
Photo of Gary Brown
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy