The position in the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu is slightly different. The Governors General have limited reserve powers which as far as I can determine only Tuvalu has exercised on one occasion to resolve an impasse in the Tuvalu Parliament.
The position of The Queen as Head of State in the three South Pacific nations is not under immediate threat in any. Especially in the case of Papua New Guinea reasonably frequent royal visits and the dignity brought to the office by successive Governors General, have kept support for The Queen, and the Royal Family, across PNG very high.
The Royal Family take a keen interest in the countries where Her Majesty is Head of State – even in Tuvalu which has a population of just over 12,000! Just how engaged the Royals are was brought home to me in 2013 when I was privileged to be personally conferred by The Princes Royal at Buckingham Palace with the CBE. She spoke fondly of her various visits to Papua New Guinea, and the impact the goodwill from the people had on her.
Advertisement
But the Covid-19 pandemic has prevented royal visits to Australia, and the island nations where The Queen is Head of State, for two years. As I recall the last royal visit to PNG was five years ago. One wonders whether the continuing low vaccination rate in PNG (3 per cent) and the cost of royal visits will enable one to take place in the foreseeable future.
What concerns me is the confluence of two factors might already been significantly diminishing support for the Constitutional Monarchy in PNG< Solomons, and Tuvalu.
The first is the absence of royal visits, but the second has the potential to have an even greater negative impact on the Monarchy.
Recently Barbados removed The Queen as Head of State, even though the people were not consulted via a referendum, on the move. The Queen, as is proper, accepted the decision and sent Prince Charles to the handover ceremonies. On the surface it was a smooth and amicable transition.
But beneath the surface there is NO doubt that the growing links which Barbados has with China (principally via extensive Belt and Board infrastructure loans) was a factor in the decision to break with the Monarchy. No doubt whatsoever.
I fear that China's first target in our region will be the Solomon Islands. Even though the SI was a British colony until it gained independence the links with the Royal Family have been less than in the case of PNG.
Advertisement
China's influence in the Solomon Islands is, as I have written on several occasions, massive, and even more so given that the SI only switched relations from Taiwan to Beijing in 2018. I have estimated that over 80 per cent of the SI exports go to China. And just about all public sector construction work is now undertaken by Chinese companies.
The question is what can Australia do about the position – without being seen to interfere in the foreign and economic policy position of independent countries.
The only real opportunity for Australia, and maybe New Zealand, is to help facilitate royal visits to all three island nations as soon as the pandemic circumstances make possible. Royal visits are costly, and beyond the capacity of any of our three neighbours to fund.
The continuing role of the Constitutional Monarchy can at least slow China's economic influence extending even more than it already has to the systems of government all three countries have adopted.
But I fear the inevitable. Our neighbours will end the role of the Monarch as Head of State long before Australia (and even New Zealand) does.
However, the very least we can do is to help facilitate royal visits to our region. It won't harm our regional standing, it will annoy China, but it will serve the "Australian national interest" well.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
6 posts so far.