Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Papua New Guinea prepares for its most consequential elections since independence

By Jeffrey Wall - posted Friday, 10 December 2021


These are just a few example of what "Take Back PNG" means in reality. It's a form of economic nationalism with obvious "socialist – big government" implications. At a time when PNG continues to run up huge annual budget deficits, "Take Back PNB" is and will increasingly be a costly impost on the fiscal position.

Papua New Guineans are overwhelmingly pro-business and free enterprise. They are rightly suspicious of too much government, especially too much government intervention in business and industry. Socialist parties have never done well in Papua New Guinea for these reasons.

When you look at the record of state-owned corporations in PNG, who would blame them???

Advertisement

The state-run electricity generation and distribution system is inefficient and costly, with blackouts a daily occurrence in many centres, Most state owned enterprises are in terrible shape, and the basic services provided by the government – health, education, roads etc – have never been worse than they are today.

It will be interesting to see if any PNG leaders, notably Peter O'Neill and Opposition Leader Belden Namah, run campaigns that challenge the "practicality and reality" of "Take Back PNG". Former prime ministers, Sir Julius Chan and Paias Wingti, as well as other party leaders, may do so as well.

If so, PNG might just for the first time have a real policy contest – between a big state, interventionist government that limits the ability to fund basic services and one that offers a real alternative of small business growth, improved basic service delivery and reduced state debt.

There is unquestionably an "attraction" in what Marape has been outlining – but in practical terms Papua New Guinea is in a very weak fiscal position, and a worrying economic state given the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccination rates at barely 3%.

The challenge his opponents face is to articulate a message that does not dismiss "Take Back PNG", but looks at it in a practical "real life" way. And to offer an alternative based on improving the living standards of the 9 million people of PNG who frankly have suffered for too long from poor and poorly focussed government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

Article edited by Margaret-Ann Williams.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeffrey Wall CSM CBE is a Brisbane Political Consultant and has served as Advisor to the PNG Foreign Minister, Sir Rabbie Namaliu – Prime Minister 1988-1992 and Speaker 1994-1997.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeffrey Wall

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy