Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kabul: some good must come of this

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 19 August 2021


We should also reassess our military strategy. The reason that the Afghani army was rolled up so quickly was partly psychological – if the Yanks had deserted them, and defeat was certain, then where was the advantage in doing anything other than suing for personal peace and heading off home.

It was also that they had been designed to be only one component in a much more sophisticated fighting force. This is the same model that our own armed forces operate on. It's essentially the Roman model, where the Empire would provide the legionaries and allies would provide light cavalry, archers, slingers. If you take the legionaries out of the mix, you have nothing left.

In Afghanistan, the Afghan army was doing the legionaries work but supported by intelligence and most crucially air-support, which is where much of the heavy military grunt work occurs in modern warfare.

Advertisement

If the US affection for Australia wouldn't extend to supporting us, then our armed forces would be rolled up just as quickly as the Afghan ones. We need to lift our defence spending, and to justify this we need to be much more questioning of the inevitability of US support.

And, in general, we also need to take off our rose-coloured polaroids and see the world for what it is – an often hostile place where no one owes you a living, and where they are happy to take it away if it suits them.

We don't face a threat from anything like the Taliban. Our threat is larger, more potent, and more insidious. The Chinese are offering us client state status. It's not shootings or beheadings necessarily, but at the very least it is tribute and up from there with varying levels of control.

If this is the beginning of the end of US world power, then we need to calibrate for that. And if, as is more likely, it is a very nasty accident in the long march, then we need to consider how we draw the US into a closer alliance, so that unlike Afghanistan, we aren't seen as disposable.

These are not mutually exclusive aims. Afghanistan reminds us that since 1945 we've experienced a period of incredible peace and that the best way to ensure peace is not just to prepare for war, but to have robust plans with multiple redundancies.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Spectator.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

47 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 47 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy