Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Circling the wagons for Gladys

By Paul Collits - posted Monday, 19 October 2020


With the NSW Government, where exactly do you start and stop?

The onus is on those who claim Gladys's superior policy making record to make the case. They never do, because it isn't there. Her record has been somewhere between mediocre and disastrous. It looks good to some partly because we in New South Wales are so used to having simply awful governments. None was worse than that of the recently and sadly departed John Fahey, a good man leading a rotten and mercifully short lived government.

Even the normally excellent Henry Ergas spoke of Berejiklian's "previously untarnished reputation".

Advertisement

He has got to be joking. This might be her first brush with ICAC, but untarnished? Not tarnished by the secret deals with baby killing greens and the payoffs to them? By the bullying by her offsiders of Barilaro? By the under the counter saving of the career of the creepy Don Harwin? By the backflips without explanation? By her frittering away money on expensive and unwanted light rail systems while city businesses went bankrupt? By her privatisation deals with greenie energy companies? By her allowing Michael Photios to keep running the state from the safe distance of his lucrative consulting practice, built solely on the back of his privileged access to NSW ministers? Plenty of tarnish there, I would think.

She has patently breached her own Ministerial Code of Conduct. (As Caroline Overington noted, the real October surprise is that New South Wales has one). I suspect the Premier lied under oath, but the proof of that, if it comes, must wait for another day. She knew about her boyfriend – she even kicked him out of the building in August 2018. Then kept sharing his bed. And still keeping it from colleagues.

Speaking of keeping the relationship secret, this was a workplace. The right thing to do when you take up with a colleague should be for one of you to get another job, or at least to bring the relationship into the open so that everyone in the office knows the new circs. Not exactly teamwork. And, of course, she has perpetuated the political culture of a state where people routinely pay other people to get access to ministers, to get them to decide things in their favour. Not just perpetuated the culture of sleaze, but participated in it. This is all on the record.

As reported by the ABC, in State Parliament, Opposition Leader Jodi McKay moved a motion of no confidence based on four points:

  • She failed to report her knowledge of Mr Maguire's business dealings;
  • She failed to report discussions she had with Mr Maguire, including his commissions on business;
  • She failed under the ICAC rules to report corrupt conduct;
  • She failed to "uphold any standard of propriety" across her government.

All fair questions to be asking in the bear pit that is the NSW Parliament.

Advertisement

Really, Henry Ergas. The "good person hard done by" line will not work, I am afraid.

Gladys only looks good because there is a lunatic (Andrews) south of the southern border, and another not far off lunacy (Palaszczuk) north of the northern border. This comparative exoneration argument might be true but certainly is irrelevant.

The lead in line to the Ergas article stated:

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article was first published on The Freedoms Project.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Paul Collits is a freelance writer and editor and a retired academic. He has higher research degrees in Political Science and in Geography and Planning. His writing can be followed at The Freedoms Project. His work has also been published at The Spectator Australia, Quadrant, Lockdown Sceptics, CoviLeaks, Newsweekly, TOTT News and A Sense of Place Magazine.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Paul Collits

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Paul Collits
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy