Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Thousands of registered migration agents in Australia to lose accreditation

By Murray Hunter - posted Monday, 14 September 2020


Conversely, there is no entry requirement for a lawyer to register and work as a lawyer RMA, providing they hold a legal practising certificate, regardless of their knowledge and skills in migration law and practice.

As of 31st December 2019, there were 7,249 RMAs of which 5,027 were non-lawyer RMAs and 2,222 lawyer RMAs. According to industry sources, the value of migration advice industry was worth almost AUD 1.0 Billion in 2019, although substantially lower in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and closing of Australian borders.

With the livelihoods of up to 5,000 non-lawyer RMAs at stake, a vast array of industry experience and expertise will be lost to those who require migration assistance. And the more important issue is the recent migration legislation has only perpetuated the shortcomings by creating an uneven field, in favour of certified lawyers, over non-lawyer RMAs who have been the backbone of client advice since the 1980s, which will ultimately impact on all vulnerable immigration customers’ interests.

Advertisement

RMA Voice Inc has made requests to the Department of Home Affairs that the shortcomings in the recommendations within the Kendall Report 2014 should be examined, and corrected to remedy the bias in favour of lawyers over non-lawyer RMAs. It is the view of many within the industry that the implementation of the recommendations will drastically increase the cost of migration and visa advice to clients, and potentially represent a loss of expertise within the industry, as non-migration specialists take up the void that has been serviced very well according to OMARA’s own statistics by non-lawyer RMAs. In addition, the current registration body OMARA will be greatly weakened, as legal practitioners don’t have to register, which will potentially lead to a number of accountability issues within the migration agent profession in the future. This is counterproductive to the Department of Home Affairs vision of creating a world class migration advice industry.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Murray Hunter is an associate professor at the University Malaysia Perlis. He blogs at Murray Hunter.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Murray Hunter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Murray Hunter
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy