Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Political betrayal, treachery, and political hara-kiri in Malaysia

By Murray Hunter - posted Tuesday, 3 March 2020


At 10.30 am on Sunday, March 1, a week of attempted putsch and counter-putsch and political infighting which broke apart the ruling Pakatan Harapan government ended when Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM) President Muhyiddin Yassin was shown in as Malaysia’s eighth prime minister by Malaysia’s king, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, at the royal palace.

It also broke apart Muhyiddin’s own party and could well see the end of the outsize career of the departing prime minister, the 94-year-old Mahathir Mohamad, after 55 years on the national and international scene as a persistent advocate of ethnic Malay and Islamic rights. During the past week of turmoil, it seemed to hardlymattered if he was Malaysia’s prime minister, the interim prime minister or the former prime minister, he has been the central political figure in a drama largely of his own making, engineered to serve his own ends.Unless he can pull yet another rabbit out of his hat, he could be relegated to political oblivion at last.

The week saw intervention by the Agong, Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, negotiation and horse trading for support and a disputed decision as to who would be the new prime minister. Both the national Pakatan Harapan coalition fell, led for almost two tumultuous years by Mahathir, along with the Johor state government. The Kedah, Perak, and Melaka PH state governments may also fall later in the week as the implications of the new power shift, made up of the once-discredited United Malays National Organization, the rural Islamic Parti Islam Malaysia, or PAS, and Bersatu,, which switched sides and abandoned Mahathir. 

Advertisement

However, this new coalition is very fragile, and will be subject to challenge in the Dewan Rakyat (parliament) when it is expected to convene on March 9 March. This parliamentary reconvening date may be delayed as the 1-year-old Muhyiddin, Mahathir’s former lieutenant, begins the painstaking process of negotiating who will take up positions in his new cabinet. Muhyiddin does not have the sole discretion that Mahathir had when Pakatan Harapan came to power in May 2018. He will have to dole out positions on the basis of support given, rather than merit and ability.

This will be complicated even more as many senior members of UMNO, a major coalition partner, are either under investigation, been charged, or currently under trial on criminal charges. What deals Muhyiddin did to secure the premiership are just unknown. For instance, UMNO’s leader Najib Razak is in the dock, facing multiple charges for his role in the looting of the state-backed 1Malaysia Development Bhd., which lost US$4.6 billion to corruption and mismanagement in the biggest scandal in Malaysian history. The deputy prime minister Ahmad Zahidi Hamad faces 45 counts of corruption and several other top UMNO officers face a multiplicity of other charges.  Revoking the charges risks substantial public fury.

Anwar and Mahathir both now feel betrayed by treachery on the part of Muhyiddin that answered Mahathir’s own treachery and will not stand idly by. Only this morning (March 1) Mahathir failed in his attempt to have a meeting with the Agong, where he claimed he had a majority of supporters in the parliament. Consequently, Muhyiddin’s coalition will be challenged in parliament. This won’t be clean, as both sides are entering parliamentary procedures which will be challenged by standing orders and objections.

Today there is great public outcry and controversy over what has happened over the last week. Many already feel that Muhyiddin is an illegitimate prime minister because of doubt over the numbers who really supported one or the other. Pakatan Harapan trolls are going to town to portray Muhyiddin as illegitimate. Second, many people feel this “backdoor” taking of government is against the mandate that the people gave PH last election. There is clearly anger being manifested over both the media and social media, with even news agencies being blamed for being critical of Mahathir.

That is ironic, as only a few days ago social media was full of criticism for Mahathir, who put the crisis in motion with an attempt to put together a coalition of his own that would have ended multiracial and multicultural government in the country in favour of so-called Ketuanan Melayu, or Malay political supremacy. Such is the emotion generated by the last week.

On the other side, a recent survey foundthat 50 percent of 1,000 voters surveyed saw a better future under an all-Bumiputera coalition government. This is very much in line with GE14 voting trends, where UMNO and PAS together actually garnered 500,000 more votes than the Pakatan Harapan coalition at the time. This is also a dilemma for Pakatan Harapan. If a snap election were called after winning a vote of no confidence in Muhyiddin’s new government, it would be extremely difficult to defeat the new government at the polls.

Advertisement

To a great degree this crisis was brought about by the Harapan government itself. Its emotional leader, the long-time opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, was hesitant to take disciplinary party action against Azmin Ali, nominally his lieutenant, who repeatedly challenged him, and for Azmin’s allies in the party, for the 20 months they were in government. Anwar’s political softness cost dearly.

Second, the continued talk about leadership succession, with Mahathir ignoring his pledge to step down after two years in power, went on and on, giving the impression that governance was about who had power, rather than any commitment to work for the people who had created a political revolution by kicking the Barisan Nasional out after 70years in power.

This is the issue that sparked the attempted putsch against the Harapan government after a fiery presidential council meeting on 21st February. After the Sheraton putsch, Mahathir blundered badly by resigning, something he has done time and time again when he doesn’t get his way. This weakened his position greatly, allowing Muhyiddin to move from attempted putsch to coup d’état.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published on Asia Sentinel.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Murray Hunter is an associate professor at the University Malaysia Perlis.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Murray Hunter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Murray Hunter
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy