Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

More anthropologists and fewer economists, please

By Keith Suter - posted Thursday, 2 January 2020


Anthropologists have examined the casualties of change while most economists have ignored them. They are experts in examining the lived experiences and cultural contexts of these changes.

Donald Trump in 2016 was a genius in mobilizing the anger that many traditionally blue collar Democrat supporters felt about being neglected by the east coast and west coast affluent Democrat politicians. Globalization and free trade had worked well for some people (especially in finance) but had eroded the US's manufacturing base. There was no place for them in the new services-based economy.

The Democrats were also perceived as ignoring the cultural interests of the working class: family, faith and community. Traditional cultural affiliations are important to them.

Advertisement

The economic theory was that as free trade increased and traditional US factory jobs declined, so workers would move elsewhere in the US looking for new types of work. But the economists got it wrong. Workers (even if unemployed) still have an emotional investment in their community. West Virginia coal miners, for example, did not move (as the economists predicted they would). They dropped their usual political affiliations and voted for Trump.

In short, in the US and UK, the right won the economic debate and the left won the culture debate. There were both new right economic rationalism and left-wing political correctness, de-platforming and silencing of people with alternative views.

Many poorer people felt excluded from this new society. Anthropologists listened to them. Anthropologists are able to translate stories of everyday life into a form of knowledge.

The 2008 global financial crisis should have forced the political class into recognizing that economics alone will not explain how societies operate. There should have been greater attention to social structures and social relations.

But the political class continued on with business as usual. The class got a series of rude awakenings in 2016 with the Brexit vote and the Trump triumph. The political class is still having difficulty breaking its reliance on economists.

Ditch the economists and recruit more anthropologists.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Keith Suter is a futurist, thought leader and media personality in the areas of social policy and foreign affairs. He is a prolific and well-respected writer and social commentator appearing on radio and television most weeks.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keith Suter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Keith Suter
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy