Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia needs clean nuclear energy

By Tom Biegler - posted Monday, 16 December 2019


It is now conventional wisdom that

  • Combatting climate change calls for deep cuts in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from using fossil fuels coal, oil and natural gas.
  • A shift to "clean energy", specifically to renewables, will solve the emissions problem.
  • Solar and wind will become the main renewable energy sources.

Even though emissions keep rising, public policy takes for granted that the renewables remedy for CO2 emissions will eventually work. It's just a matter of persevering until "100% renewables" is reached. Problem solved. But is it? Here I try to quantify future clean energy requirements and check the progress being made. What emerges is a wake-up call.

Advertisement

1. What is "clean energy"?

Electricity was once seen as the shining example of clean energy. Yes, it was clean for users. Distant power stations did emit smoke and soot but only nearby populations suffered. The picture changed with realisation that CO2 emissions had a global impact. Location was not relevant, quantity was. Lots of CO2, anywhere, meant "dirty".

First, a quick look at measuring energy and emissions. Energy, the capacity to do work, is a quantity, an amount. Power is different from energy. Power is a rate. A simple analogy is that energy is to power as distance is to speed. (Colloquial usage of "power" for "energy" in terms like "power supply", "power station", "wind power" is a slight nuisance, safely ignored.)

The basic energy unit is the joule (J). The basic power unit is the watt (W). One watt = one joule per second. One sees joules and watts in everyday life, e.g. kilojoules measuring food energy, kilowatts rating the power of a toaster or car motor.

Measuring the energy a country uses calls for much bigger units. The most practical (in my view) are multiples of the joule. The petajoule PJ is 1015 joules, the exajoule EJ is 1018 joules. One strikes many different units in the energy field. Online tools like http://www.onlineconversion.com/energy.htm make comparisons easy.

The life-cycle CO2 emissions intensity, the quantity of CO2 emitted per unit of electrical energy, is themeasure of how clean the electricity from a given source is. It takes into account all production steps, like fuel and materials extraction; manufacture, transport and installation of energy conversion equipment; plant operation over its entire lifetime; and eventual end-of-life decommissioning and disposal. A solar panel, for example, emits no CO2. It still results in emissions because its life cycle uses fossil fuels. Methodology for calculating life-cycle emissions intensities is complex but well established.

Advertisement

This Table shows typical values for various energy sources and technologies (from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

Typical life-cycle emissions intensities for electricity from different energy sources (kg CO2/MWh)

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

34 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Tom Biegler is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering and a former Chief of CSIRO Division of Mineral Chemistry.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tom Biegler

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 34 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy