Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Losing control of affordable reliable power

By Geoff Carmody - posted Tuesday, 15 October 2019


For near-100% reliability, any given renewables generation capacity can never exceed about 50% of total capacity inclusive of dispatchable back-up. And, on average, the duplicated fossil-fuel 'dispatchable' capacity backing it up supplies much more than half the power actually delivered to users (maybe 75% or more).

We're learning about this right now, with SA and, more recently, Queensland, as exemplars.

Activists will loudly condemn any use of fossil fuels as 'dispatchable' power. They have fomented strong political pressure, on weak politicians, inducing an investment drought therein.

Advertisement

Let's assume these people want reliable power (do they?). If so, they presumably support 'dispatchable' renewables back-up.

That's manufactured batteries. Ignore emissions costs in their production and disposal, and re-charging efficiency losses.

How much battery storage would be needed? What would it cost?

Both rise exponentially as reliability standards and renewables' share both approach 100%. For example, see an MIT Technology Review analysis for California titled The US$2.5 trillion reason why we can't rely on batteries to clean up the grid (James Temple, July 2018).

For PocketNEM fans, have you noticed how average wholesale power prices are zero or negative more frequently, especially in SA and Qld? Sometimes the entire NEM has zero power prices.

Good news, surely? For activists, yes. This hastens the shut-down of existing fossil fuel power and deters new investment therein.

Advertisement

It reflects fast-rising solar and wind generation capacity. Measured against the NEM's capacity actually to use the power generated, it reflects excess supply of solar and wind generation under sunny or windy conditions.

It also hints at, but does not quantify, another excess supply effect. This is euphemistically called 'curtailed supply'. This is power that is actually generated by solar or wind, but not used. It's wasted.

Solar and wind investors should heed these warnings.

Zero or negative prices for power actually used are unsustainable.

So is power actually produced, but not used at all.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody was a director of Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He died on October 27, 2024. He favoured a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy