Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Evironmental ideology: killing a Victorian rural industry by stealth

By Mark Poynter - posted Tuesday, 12 March 2019


It is notable that new Leadbeater’s Possum detections have now become so numerous that its critically endangered status is under review by the Federal Government; and acutely ironic that the industry is now being denied access to forests because there are too many possums rather than too few! 

The Victorian Government’s predilection for appeasing environmental ideology, suggests that it is happy for the lives and livelihoods of rural workers and their communities to be ridden over roughshod by eco-activists who “know” what is best for their nature-pure agendas, but don’t understand that the best management usually involves compromise and people.

The extent and severity of Victoria’s current bushfire situation is already ample proof of the greater ecological price to be paid when time-proven forest management practices are overridden by the sort of ‘green’ thinking that prevents prescribed cool burns on narrow ecological grounds, or encourages anti-logging protesters to prevent logging machinery being shifted to help fight bushfires. Instances of both of these scenarios have been documented in relation to last week’s West Gippsland bushfires. 

Advertisement

Further to this, the current temporary (?) unemployment of timber industry contractors reportedly led to a lengthened time taken to begin fighting several of these fires, to an extent where they were enabled to grew far bigger and more environmentally damaging than would otherwise have been the case.

In time, it will be more widely recognised that evicting timber production from the Australian bush has been counter-productive to good environmental outcomes given how it weakens fire management capability. The question is whether this realisation will come soon enough to save a meaningful timber industry from governments seemingly intent on virtue signalling to appease environmental ideologues.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Poynter is a professional forester with 40 years experience. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia and his book Going Green: Forests, fire, and a flawed conservation culture, was published by Connor Court in July 2018.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Poynter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark Poynter
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy