Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Policy foundations for affordable, reliable, lower-emissions power, absent NE'G' nonsense

By Geoff Carmody - posted Monday, 24 September 2018


Consider the results of a Californian study on seasonality by MIT in a paper titled'The $2.5 trillion reason we can't rely on batteries to clean up the grid', James Temple, MIT Technology Review, 27/7/2018.

For solar power especially, there are large sun intensity variations between the summer and winter solstices. Polar region variations are obviously large, but even in sunny California, they're large too.

For reliability, these variations require massive solar power 'over-production' in summer, massive battery storage of it, and massive battery storage depletion in winter, to ensure year-round reliable power.

Advertisement

There are seasonal cycles for wind, too. Seasonality further multiplies generation and storage capacity needed for reliability, especially for solar, and its costs.

In California, the MIT study estimated that, if solar and wind each provided 40% of power generation, in summer total generation would be around 12 times as much as in winter.

That's lots of excess renewables generation capacity in summer, plus similar battery storage capacity, to ensure adequate reliable winter power.

See chart 1.

 

Chart 1

Advertisement

Clean air task force analysis of CAISO data, 'The $2.5 trillion reason we can't rely on batteries to clean up the grid', James Temple, MIT Technology Review, 27/7/2018.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This is a policy summary of a longer article by Geoff Carmody on 17 August 2018 reviewing the many deficiencies of renewable energy policies, titled "Does renewable energy sustain Australian agriculture, or drive it offshore?". The longer paper can be downloaded by clicking here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy