But the issue that is rarely raised is that the people who have built
those new developments and who have made handsome profits from them have
been able to do so because of massive Government spending on the Homebush
Bay site. Again, when the Government constructs the Chatswood to
Parramatta rail link it will have a large impact on development potential
along the route. Why should not some of this resource be directed towards
affordable housing? In the report of the Affordable Housing Taskforce to
the NSW Government, it states: "Another key aspect of State
Government responsibility is through its planning and approval powers.
These systems will need to be used more effectively to provide stronger
leadership, incentives and pressures which will encourage local councils
and other parties to contribute to the necessary improvement in the supply
of affordable housing."
Again, while the Government has been keen to encourage church and
community groups to put in land and resources for affordable housing
projects, how much has the Government itself done in this regard? Why has
the situation developed whereby the Government can say in regard to
surplus Government land that it must always be sold at market rates? The
closure of many health institutions in recent years has provided
opportunities for Government, but they have not been taken. Sites which
Governments never paid for in the first place are sold at market rates,
while we are told that there are no resouces for affordable housing
projects.
Why did the NSW Government not accept the recommendation of its
Affordable Housing Task Force to establish targets for affordable housing
in each region of the State? Its response, to establish a small
directorate and to give them the token amount of $10 million for
demonstration projects, was very inadequate.
Advertisement
Unless some of these issues are addressed, we face the prospect of more
and more households coming under housing stress, and therefore greater
social needs emerging. The impacts of the Olympics and the introduction of
the GST at the same time this year are two potential factors for the
increase in rents, and this will possibly push more households into
housing stress. The decline of many traditional sources of low cost
housing is also another factor.
So, for the churches there are two priorities. First, we must continue
to lobby the Commonwealth Government to not only preserve but to improve
the CSHA. We must continue to lobby the State Government to actively show
leadership in regard to housing affordability and to address some of the
basic causes of homelessness. Finally, the churches themselves must be
prepared to do whatever they can to channel resources into this area.
Spare land, spare buildings, management abilities, etc, are all part of
that picture.
This is an edited extract from a speech given at the Churches Community Housing Conference on the 29 March, 2000.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.