Foreign Minister Safadi pointedly remarked:
We’ll continue to work with this current administration [to resolve the conflict] because we believe in the key role of the United States in delivering that peace. We cannot give up. It is a difficult situation. The challenge is not to make it worse and to find a way of moving forward. If we do not have the two-state solution, then I think we’re looking at a longer period of conflict that would only play into the hands of the spoilers and radicals who want to exploit the suffering and despair of people to spread their agenda of hate.
Jordan’s position starkly contrasts with the PLO which will not accept America’s pivotal role.
Advertisement
Any negotiated two-state solution involving the creation of another Arab State between Israel and Jordan for the first time in recorded history was rejected by the Arabs in 1947 - could have been created at any time by the Arab League between 1948 and 1967 - and was again rejected by the PLO in 2000/1 and 2008.
Jordan - comprising 78% of former Palestine - has now signalled its readiness to move forward with Trump on achieving his “ultimate deal”. Trump’s latest funding commitment to Jordan guarantees Jordan’s co-operation for the next five years.
The PLO’s anti-America stance continues to test Trump’s patience.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
11 posts so far.
About the Author
David Singer is an Australian Lawyer, a Foundation Member of the International Analyst Network and Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International - an organisation calling for sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza to be allocated between Israel and Jordan as the two successor States to the Mandate for Palestine. Previous articles written by him can be found at www.jordanispalestine.blogspot.com.