Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Democracy keeps failing so maybe it’s time we try logicracy

By Mark Manolopoulos - posted Tuesday, 1 August 2017


I propose that "logicracy" might be a better system. The word itself discloses its core meaning: in the same way that "demo-cracy" means rule (from the Greek word kratos) by the people (demos),"logicracy" would be rule by logic. Government by Reason. In stark contrast to the present system, where prejudicial electorates mandate (quasi-)charming demagogues, logicracy would be government by Reason.

"Logicracy" sounds ideal in theory: who would reject a thoroughly rational - and therefore ethical, egalitarian, ecological, etc. - form of governance? But how might it work in practice?

I think a first step should be the formation of an international network of the world's wisest thinkers and activists who passionately concur that society should be governed by Reason. In the grand but all-too-rare tradition of Plato and his Republic, the network would be tasked with collaboratively - yes, democratically - creating a blueprint of a better global society, including its political system. This "coalition of the wiser" would therefore thoughtfully conceive the best (or least worst) form of government.

Advertisement

Of course, during its deliberations, the network may ascertain that Churchill could be right after all: electoral democracy might be the least worst system we can conceive. While I doubt this shall be the case, we need to remain steadfastly loyal to Reason - this is the very definition of being a "logicrat": wherever rationality leads, we should follow.

I myself am drawn to the idea that the network might be the central legislative body, with local groups enacting more place-specific laws. Whatever form logicracy assumes, I anticipate it shall be a vast improvement on the present situation. Our laws, institutions, and social systems should conform to the dictates of Reason - not the dictates of "democratically elected" egomaniacs, multinational corporations, fundamentalist religions, and so on.

Otherwise, the madness will continue.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mark Manolopoulos is a philosopher. Mark is the author of Following Reason (2019), Radical Neo-Enlightenment (2018), If Creation is a Gift (2009), and many scholarly journal articles and op-ed pieces.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Manolopoulos

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark Manolopoulos
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy