Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The NT must keep the door firmly closed to fracking

By Rosalie Schultz - posted Monday, 8 May 2017

There is growing concern in the NT that the Gunner Government may remove the moratorium on fracking. However, rejecting the moratorium would be a grave mistake, and Territorians know this. That's why we voted for the moratorium in the landslide ALP victory in August 2016.

People may think of fracking as an environmental or industrial issue, but ultimately fracking is an issue of health and wellbeing. Fracking is not safe, and that's why countries and states around the world - including Victoria - have permanently banned it.

Doctors for the Environment Australia, a medical group of leading health experts including a Nobel laureate and recipients of the Australia of the Year award, recently submitted its response to the NT Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracturing. DEA argued that robust national and international expertise and local knowledge have shown that fracking can be hazardous to health.


This sentiment has been echoed by peak medical body the Australian Medical Association, as well as the United Kingdom's Chief Scientific Adviser, whose annual report drew a comparison between fracking impacts and past health issues such as exposure to asbestos and tobacco.

People's health can be affected in many ways throughout the fracking process.

Whether or not to frack is a divisive issue which can potentially damage community and individual health. For example, fracking operations in the Surat Basin in Queenslandhave left previously cohesive communities fractured.

People dependent on the land through pastoralism, and Aboriginal communities whose ancestral ties span thousands of years, may be put at odds by those who want to use the country for short term financial gain. Rural lifestyles will be upset by the arrival of fly-in-fly-out workers. Health may be affected through stress and rental price escalation, or through contact with contaminated water, air, soil or food. Road traffic accidents are another risk associated with gasfield development.

The work of the Hydraulic Fracking Inquiry panel in framing the diversity of issues that need to be considered is impressive. These include water, land, air, public health, Aboriginal people and their culture, social impacts, and the regulatory framework.

Water is a major concern.


The large quantity of water consumed by fracking- 4 to 22 million litres for each frack - could have profound impacts on natural and human environments. This is especially a concern in NT with our fragile arid zone environments.

Water quality left after fracking is another concern. The fracking process uses multiple chemicals which havenot been properly assessed for safety. It can also release naturally occurring chemicals within the shale, including heavy metals such as mercury, lead and arsenic, and radioactive elements such as radium, thorium and uranium. Even common salt can be detrimental in the high concentrations that arise during fracking. Some of the fluids used in fracking return to the surface, and need to be treated or disposed of. Any escape of these into the environment, whether from watercourses, ponds, closed tanks or evaporation ponds can contaminate other water.

The focus on developing a regulatory framework for fracking suggests an underlying anticipation that the government will find a justification to end the moratorium on fracking. This would follow the pattern of the NT Hawke inquiry into fracking in 2013. Hawke concluded that a moratorium was unnecessary. However the CLP government that followed this advice was swept from office, suggesting people disagreed.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Rosalie Schultz is a Northern Territory GP and public health physician, and a member of Doctors for the Environment Australia

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Rosalie Schultz
Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy