Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Authoritarians and same sex marriage

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Tuesday, 2 May 2017

There’s a theory doing the rounds that the same sex marriage lobby resisted the proposal for a plebiscite in February because they thought it would not have won. It’s not a theory I subscribe to.

The polls have always shown substantial majority of public support for same sex marriage in Australia, and if the socially conservative Irish could manage to vote in favour, we would certainly have done it too.

So if it wasn’t for the Greens and Labor blocking the bill in the Senate, thousands of people would be getting married right now. And all of the businesses associated with weddings – the photographers, caterers, suit hire shops, travel agents, honeymoon resorts, counsellors and divorce lawyers - would be celebrating with them.


A plebiscite was never my preferred method of going about it, but I voted in favour because I believe that a liberal democratic society like ours can stand the strain of open debate, with room left over to celebrate at the end. All the feedback from Ireland is that it was a positive experience overall.

Sad to say, both Labor and the Greens love talking about same sex marriage so much they don’t actually want to achieve it.  Both know that while the issue drags on, it allows them to rally support and accuse the Coalition of being opposed.

To reinforce that, they came up with an argument that relies on a remarkably stereotypical, if not homophobic, premise - that gay and lesbian people are just too fragile to countenance a public debate. Apparently this affliction only applies to Australian gays and lesbians, who are not quite as tough as the Irish.

What surprised me was how quickly the same sex marriage lobby fell into line behind them, making me wonder whether their psychological need to demonise conservative politicians is more powerful than their desire for their friends and colleagues to get married.

The Greens demonstrated their skin-deep commitment to the issue on two memorable occasions last year when they opposed my motion to allow their own same sex marriage bill to be debated and put to a vote in the Senate. They were more concerned about passing a law to keep smaller parties out of Parliament. Richard Di Natale even moved a procedural device known as the guillotine to force Penny Wong to shut up about it.

And although I remain the only Senator to have voted in favour of same sex marriage at every opportunity, my support for a plebiscite was enough to make me the target of obnoxious slurs from sections of the gay community that would make a homophobe blush.


It’s sad that it’s come to this.

When I entered the debate, same sex marriage in Australia was a political and religious no-go zone for many members of the Coalition, and for some members of Labor. 

In introducing my Freedom to Marry Bill in 2014, my approach was to ask politicians of all stripes to recognise that legislating about private relationships was not their job. I still believe that if it comes to a conscience vote in parliament, characterising the issue as one of government intrusion into a private matter remains the best way to gain the support of conservatives. And without the support of conservatives, it will not pass.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Australian.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

41 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 41 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy