The real debate that we should be having is not why women should be
entitled to paid maternity leave but rather what should the national
scheme look like and who should top up the payment to pre-leave earnings
and how?
Peter Costello himself recently highlighted the confusion in the debate
when he argued that paid maternity leave would not fix Australia's ailing
fertility rate and that such arguments were wrong because there was no
"magic bullet". This led to confusion in the media over what the
Government line really was, but maybe all that Peter Costello was doing
was trying to do was deal directly with paid maternity leave and hadn't
been briefed properly on his Government's "family policy"
diversion strategy.
It goes without saying that all interested parties - employers, the
Government, unions and community organisations and of course women
themselves must examine other support measures for all mothers and
consider family policy initiatives which will assist workers to balance
their work and family lives.
Advertisement
There are also other serious and pressing issues relating to women's
participation in the workforce that need to be addressed such as
childcare, precarious employment, promotion and career opportunities and
pay inequity to name only a few. But this doesn't mean that a direct
response on a national scheme on paid maternity leave can't be considered
in isolation to any of these issues or policies.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.