Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Drum beaten by ABC management

By Malcolm King - posted Thursday, 7 July 2016


Don't get me wrong. It still published Chris Berg and a couple of other high profile conservative writers but they were in the minority. There is absolutely nothing wrong with publishing articles from those who have confused Marxism with street performance.

But as a lens through viewing wider Australia, it had a very small, inner suburban focus. The Drum completely missed the fact that Hanson and a raft of anti-immigration and anti-free trade senators were going to be elected in 2016.

I did a rough count going back to 2012 and around 30 contributors have advocated for same sex marriage but those against it only were allowed four articles. The same was true of left wing views on education, climate change and asylum seekers. These are all political views I generally support but only people bereft of intellectual integrity could cheer this type of censorship by exclusion.

Advertisement

As one commentator on The Guardian said:

"By branching, bizarrely, into opinion the ABC website became a kind of quasi-blog. It had everything, including cutesy videos, and endless Twitter snapshots, memes, and other rubbish, which mostly reflected the author's, own perspective. Returning the focus squarely to news (and analysis of the news) is a sensible move if the ABC website is, again, to become a serious news provider that is even on par with something like The Guardian."

People will wail and cry. They'll gnash their teeth and scream that the closing of The Drum website was Rupert Murdoch's fault or Tony Abbott's fault or Quadrant's fault or the fault of the Institute of Public Affairs. But it's not you know. The Drum was parochial and since 2012, failed to reflect diversity of opinion. It reflected in-house bias.

Of course, some writers in The Australian do the same. That's why it's called News Corporation. No public funding there – at least not that we know about.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy