Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Queensland budget 2016: Curtis Pitt’s reckoning day will come

By Judith Sloan - posted Thursday, 16 June 2016


When it comes to analysing a state budget, there are two key variables to look for. What’s happening to employee expenses and what’s happening to government debt.

On both scores, the Queensland government’s mark is a fail. In 2015-16, employee expenses grew a massive 7.3 per cent. In the next financial year, employee numbers will increase 2.4 per cent or just over 5000 and the wage bill will ­increase 4.8 per cent. But expect another blowout in employee ­expenses like this year.

When it comes to government debt, Curtis Pitt performs a sleight of hand by raiding the superannuation fund of public sector workers and directing some of the monies to paying down gross debt, by close to $2 billion. But here’s the thing: it will do nothing to alter the net debt position of the state, because the value of the super fund is included in this figure. This is the reason why Queensland has the highest gross debt per capita of all the states, but net debt per capita that puts the state in the middle of the pack. (Queensland is the only state that has had a policy of fully funding its super liabilities.) It’s a classic case of giving with one hand and taking with the other.

Advertisement

There are very real dangers in raiding the super fund, particularly as it comes on top of the decision last year by Pitt to suspend contributions for at least five years. The issue with actuarial assessments that demonstrate the scheme is overfunded is their sensitivity to small changes in key variables. A surplus can quickly disappear as these variables change.

The bottom line is this: resorting to fancy financial accounting, raiding the super fund and getting government-owned corporations to load up on debt (last year’s trick) won’t resolve the massive financial black hole that is the key feature of Queensland’s public finances.

And, by the way, forecasting a growth rate of 4 per cent for the Queensland economy next financial year is completely fanciful.

The day of reckoning will come and, it is not far away. Were the federal government to lose its AAA rating, Queensland would very quickly be marked down a further notch or two. Note Queensland was the first to lose its AAA rating after successive Labor governments racked up massive increases in debt and ramped up the size of the public service.

Rather than face the obvious facts that asset sales are required to reduce the excessive level of government debt, and that public sector employee expenses must be seriously constrained, the government would prefer to take a series of short-run decisions that will ­inevitably end in tears. This year’s budget was a classic missed opportunity for Pitt. Last week, he leaked the write-down in revenue caused by the parlous state of the mining industry. Everyone knows that state debt is way too high.

Better to come clean with the voters. Tell them the number of public servants cannot be sustained. Tell them there are a number of government-owned corpor­ations that barely return the cost of capital, but could be sold at good prices to reduce government debt.

Advertisement

You never know. Good policy could turn out to be good politics. After all, that is what the master, Paul Keating, believed.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All

This article was first published in The Australian.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Judith Sloan is Honorary Professorial Fellow at the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research at the University of Melbourne.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Judith Sloan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy