Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

That was then, this is now: Chernobyl’s legacy and Australia’s uranium

By Dave Sweeney - posted Tuesday, 26 April 2016


Against this backdrop ‘adventure tourists’, independent journalists and radiation monitoring teams in the exclusion zone witness the visible return of animals and vegetation and monitor the silent continuation of radioactive contamination.

The thirtieth anniversary has also seen increased international attention on the current parlous state of Ukraine’s nuclear sector - an issue of great relevance to Australia as Foreign Minster Julie Bishop inked a deal to supply uranium to Ukraine earlier this month.

The country that fuelled Fukushima supplying uranium to the land that gave the world Chernobyl is hardly a match made in heaven and deserves far more scrutiny.

Advertisement

There are serious and unresolved safety, security, governance and performance issues facing Ukraine’s nuclear sector.

Ukraine has fifteen nuclear reactors - four are currently running past their design lifetime while six more reach this date in 2020. So two thirds of the Ukraine’s aging nuclear fleet will be past its use by date in four short years, with all the increased risk this involves. Civil society groups and neighbouring nations have expressed deep concerns over plans to extend the reactors operations and Ukraine’s approach has seen the nation in breach of international agreements regarding transboundary environmental impact assessment.

The recent G7 foreign ministers meeting in Japan identified the conflict in Ukraine as one of the key reasons for increased global nuclear insecurity and tension. There have been armed incursions by pro-Russian militia forces into Ukrainian nuclear facilities and these have been described by some commentators as pre-deployed nuclear targets.

Two years ago Australia prudently suspended uranium sales to Russia because of this conflict. It makes scant sense now to fuel further nuclear instability in this troubled region by starting sales to Ukraine.

The thirtieth anniversary of Chernobyl is an important reminder of the risks and dangers of the nuclear sector. It is not a time to ignore important lessons in a bid to advance risky and radioactive uranium sales.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dave Sweeney is nuclear free campaigner for the Australian Conservation Foundation.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dave Sweeney

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy