Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kohler's mistakes underline why negative gearing is threatened

By Graham Young - posted Tuesday, 5 April 2016


Australia is not particularly out of line with many other rich countries in the world, many of whom treat negative gearing in different ways to us. Demographia compares property prices in a number of countries and markets on the basis of the ratio between median house prices and gross median family income.

Australia’s overall affordability index is 6.4, which is less than New Zealand (9.7) and Hong Kong (19.0). Internally, Australia’s affordability ranges between 2.5 in Karratha, to 12.2 in Sydney.

From the graph below you can see that house prices took off as interest rates retreated from their highs in the 70s and 80s.

Advertisement

House_Price_Income_Ratios_2007

Source: 12th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2016 p.7

It’s the mixture of supply and demand, plus the availability and price of credit, that are the strongest drivers of price.

His argument about the ACCB is similarly flawed. While he argues it will cut the cost of building high rise apartments, and that this will flow on to housing, this will be a passing effect.

If it is cheaper to build apartments, then over time developers will be able to bid up the price they pay for sites, given the willingness of the market to pay a given price.

Landowners, not purchasers, will be the biggest beneficiaries.

Advertisement

Indeed, it looks likely that apartment prices will fall in the short term, not because of the ABCC, should it ever arrive, but because of an oversupply. This is particularly true in Brisbane where the state government opportunistically increased the densities on a large number of near city sites, increasing supply, and profitability, without the need to manufacture more land.

The area where the ABCC will have its biggest effect will be on government projects - things like freeways, bridges and tunnels, where land is a very small part of the cost, and construction a significant part.

The reasons for opposing changes to negative gearing have little to do with the long run, and everything to do with maintaining the current integrity and justice of the taxation system, and keeping prices steady in the near run.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published on the website of the Australian Institute for Progress.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy