Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The feeble outcomes of Quixotic power crusades

By Mark S. Lawson - posted Friday, 18 December 2015

The Paris climate conference may have come up with a feel good statement about reducing emissions, but as the problems of the South Australian electricity market in integrating the state's large supply of wind power show, there is a practical limit to the use of renewables in Australia.

As reported in The Australian Financial Review in mid-Decemberthe state's wind generators produced 30 per cent of its energy needs in 2014-15, with wind and solar combined producing 38 per cent. But that high level of supply from intermittent power has played such havoc with the supply that South Australian Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis ✓called a crisis meeting of energy users and suppliers.

These problems are no surprise to power engineers, although few have been willing to make public statements for fear of the storm of criticism from powerful green and wind lobbies.


As those engineers have been saying for years, although electricity grids have to be balanced for both voltage and frequency 24 hours a day, small amounts of wind, solar and photovoltaic power can be absorbed relatively easily as the grids are operated within certain design tolerances. Tweaking the output of other generators can widen that tolerance.

High levels of alternative energy supply also can be achieved by individual countries in Europe, where the grids are much larger, denser and geographically compact than the widely spread Australian grids. If the many photovoltaic panels in Germany are buried under snow for weeks, as happens every winter, then the power authorities can buy electricity from coal plants across the border in Poland or from nuclear power stations in France. When the wind stops blowing in Denmark, that country can import hydroelectric power across the Baltic from Sweden and Norway.

Another category

South Australia is in a different category. The state can always import power from Victoria's brown coal plants over an interconnector which can supply up to 28 per cent of the state's needs, but if that interconnector falls out of service and the wind stops blowing, spot prices for the state will spike to almost $2000 a megawatt. When the wind is blowing strongly wind- farm power will flood the market to pull prices down to minus $20 (generators pay retailers to take the power). This is obviously uneconomic for conventional generators, but wind and solar generators can still make some money under the renewable energy target.

This volatility can also gravely complicate the problem of maintaining supply. As a report by Deloitte Access Economics to the Energy Supply Association of Australia, which notes this price volatility, says, this high level of renewables is "already challenging the sustainability of the system". This volatility and instability, which have also resulted in wholesale prices not much short of double those of Victoria and NSW is set to worsen as more conventional capacity is withdrawn next year. But few investors will be interested in building new plant to supply a market that has such a price lottery.

Doubts prompt meeting

At the same time, major users interested in building employment-generating projects, such as the redevelopment of the Port Pirie lead and zinc smelter, are being deterred by what promises to be an unreliable supply. Doubts expressed by Nyrstar, the Dutch company developing the Port Pyrie smelter, prompted the emergency meeting.

None of this will be acceptable or even acknowledged by the many, vocal proponents of renewable energy, which can include politicians. South Australian premier Jay Weatherill used the meeting as a venue for announcing that Adelaide would be carbon-neutral by 2050.


One excuse used by activists to brush aside these evident problems that the state can always use battery storage. But storage of that type on the scale required would mean moving Adelaide to make room for it. Pumped hydro (a big dam) is the only possible solution to the energy storage problems, but there are no suitable sites in South Australia, and the capacity required would be collosal.

Academics have proposed completely renewable energy systems for Australia which depend on a lot of assumptions  including the use of hydrothermal projects, which are a long way from practical use in Australia, if such projects ever operate. Other proposals I have seen require biodiesels at a size that have not been invented yet.

Another common delusion is to point to the likes of the Gemasolar facility in Spain, a 20 Megawatt (a pilot plant) generator and claim that it is a base load renewables plant. It is nothing of the kind. In fact, the plant has a a capacity factor (average output) of 70 per cent. The average output of a conventional plant can vary depending on the demands of the grid system it is operating on – gas plants may have an average output of 70 per cent - but they can be run at above 90 per cent, if required. Crucially, their output can also be varied. This is not so for Gemasolar. The central grid has to take what power output it gives off, and adjust the conventional power output to suit.

Renewables have their limits, and the South Australian experience is a sharp lesson in those limits..

If activists have their way and renewables take over the whole market, the result will be brownouts, energy poverty and job losses all in the name of saving the planet.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

A version of this article has appeared in the Australian Financial Review.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

42 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Lawson is a senior journalist at the Australian Financial Review. He has written The Zen of Being Grumpy (Connor Court).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark S. Lawson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark S. Lawson
Article Tools
Comment 42 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy