Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0


By Jonathan J. Ariel - posted Wednesday, 18 November 2015

Last Sunday, speaking outside a service at St Andrew's Cathedral in downtown Sydney to honour the 130 plus killed by Da'esh two days earlier, France's Ambassador to Australia, Christophe Lecourtier got it so horribly, horribly wrong. Referring to the outrage, he was blind to the truth, claiming "The battle being waged was not against Islam".

Pardon monsieur?

One would think that the terrorists shouting "Allahu Akbar" as they mowed down their victims, hinted even in a small way, as to their motivation. These killers, Mr Ambassador, may not represent all Muslims. But they are Muslims and in the absence of moderate Muslims standing up to them, they are the only Muslims who matter.


The key aim of Da'esh's barbarism - lost on the ambassador, and French Président François Hollandefor that matter - is not to kill hundreds, but instead, to terrorise society and in time to enslave tens of millions, by changing society and replacing Jesus Christ with the Prophet Mohammed as the foundation.

In Europe, Michel Houellebecq's Submission, a novel set in 2022 France, where an Islamic political party, the Muslim Brotherhood takes power democratically and turns the country, slowly, surely, subtlety and deliberately in the direction of Mecca and Medina, is flying off book stores' shelves faster than you can deep fry a felafel. On sale in French since January, the book has taken Europe by storm. The clever writing, the deft understanding of the human condition, the light touches of satire (of situations, not of the characters), the restrained manner in which great themes are outlined and the erudite arguments employed by Houellebecq echo those of Joris-Karl Huysmans, the late 1800's French novelist and idol of the protagonist in Submission, François, a mid-tier, mid-40s literature professor at the Sorbonne.

Whilst exposing François'nihilistic sex-fuelled lifestyle and the drudgery of struggling through every day without close relationships or life goals, the book exposes its downside: a bit too much pornography and a good 30 surplus pages.

At its core, Submission unmasks France's (and by inference Europe's? The West's?) aggregate inability to list those Christian values it cherishes and wants to keep, let alone identify all the threats, both foreign and domestic, to those values. And as for addressing France's capacity to fight for those values, well that's un pont trop loin pour les Français.

The book predicts a France based on Shari'a. It does so through very subtle and elegant passages about the fundamental issues of culture and politics: religion, families, education and power at all costs. The last, in a shock to Houellebecq's many leftist critics, is an attack on non-Muslim political parties.

In its ascendancy to power, the Muslim Brotherhood faces few hurdles. There are no widespread anti-immigration rallies. There is no Bible thumping pro-Christian politicians. The Archbishop of Paris is mute. There is no invasion by Muslim hordes and there is no coup d'état.


What there is however is fatigue, and plenty of it.

Nationwide fatigue, from Calais in the north to Perpignan in the south. From Strasbourg in the east to La Rochelle in the west.

Houllebecq's media interviews promoting the book indicate that Catholics can't be bothered to fight for the future of their (supposed) once shining republic and for their Church. Rather, they concentrate on an entitlement mentality, where welfare cheques enable the "good life" while ignoring the decomposition of their own culture before their very eyes.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Submission by Michel Houellebecq, William Heinemann, London October 2015 (English) and January 2015 (French) US$11.99 (Nook Book) or A$32.99

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jonathan J. Ariel is an economist and financial analyst. He holds a MBA from the Australian Graduate School of Management. He can be contacted at

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jonathan J. Ariel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jonathan J. Ariel
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy