Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

APEC-Manila and South China Sea Joint Development Areas

By Stewart Taggart - posted Friday, 13 November 2015


The problem with the 'One Belt, One Road' slogan is that it tends to include vague infrastructure pathways through the disputed South China Sea.

To date, there's been little or no explanation of how China's 'One Belt, One Road' pan-regional infrastructure concept fits into China's territorial claims to the entire South China Sea under its 'Nine-Dotted Line.'

It's all looks terribly sticky for China at APEC. since discussion of one naturally segues into discussion of the other. This, in turn, could explain China's dawdling in confirming Xi's attendance.

Advertisement

No other APEC member to date has publicly supported China's Nine Dotted Line claim. Worse, APEC host the Philippines has a pending appeal before a United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) tribunal over the matter.

But if Xi doesn't attend the Manila APEC meeting, it sends a terrible signal regarding China's commitment to multilateralism.

As a result, Xi will almost certainly attend. But confirmation will likely come only at the last minute in order to discourage grandstanding by others once the commitment is locked in.

Looking at the big picture, none of Asia's countries benefit from fighting over the South China Sea.

Therefore, a solution lies in exploiting synergies between the needs and capabilities of China and her stroppiest South China Sea neighbors: Vietnam and the Philippines. To see the solution, consider what each side has and what it needs:

China has the capital and the technology to develop new South China Sea energy resources, like deep water methane hydrates. What China needs is a neighborhood (and global) 'social license' to do so.

Advertisement

China has the military potential to control the South China Sea, but it needs to avoid conflict with the United States. China also needs access to the Straits of Malacca, which Singapore and Malaysia could deny if China gets too aggressive.

In a 'worst case' scenario, Singapore and Malaysia could stymie access to the Malacca Straits to Chinese commercial vessels. This could be done by imposing endless 'random' inspections and administrative procedures over Chinese merchant traffic.

Vietnam and the Philippines, meanwhile, have legitimate claims to portions of the South China Sea as strong (or stronger) than any China's put forward to date. However, both need foreign capital to develop the resources.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published on the Grenatec blog.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stewart Taggart is principal of Grenatec, a non-profit research organizing studying the viability of a Pan-Asian Energy Infrastructure. A former journalist, he is co-founder of the DESERTEC Foundation, which advocates a similar network to bring North African solar energy to Europe.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stewart Taggart

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy