Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The planned obsolescence of the public interest

By Karl Fitzgerald - posted Thursday, 12 November 2015

A fascinating power play continues in the debate over vertical fiscal imbalance. The strategic intent is prevalent from federal to local politics, where the health of the public revenue raising system is undermined. This sideshow diverts from the beneficiaries that Adam Smith once called the Public Enemy - rent-seekers.

The Abbott government set the textbook play into action with the 2014 budget emergency stripping $80bn from state health and education. Federal grants were also frozen, impacting greatly on growth area councils. State governments were forced to consider their own sovereign revenue raising capacities. This saw South Australia's Weatherill government launch another tax review. Like so many others, it found Land Taxes the most efficient. In a sign of great promise, Treasurer Joe Hockey stepped forth to support the transition away from highly inefficient Stamp Duties to Land Taxes.

Mainstream debate predictably degenerated from high principle to the self-interest of property owners in pursuit of the windfall gains displayed so lavishly on reality TV most nights.


The 2015 Federal Treasury white paper submission raised the bar on Land Taxes. They found even greater efficiencies by including the revenue dividend of foreign investment in property. The benefits are profound. Land Tax is the only revenue mechanism to generate positive benefits for the economy. Accompanying the white paper was a much needed animation series attempting to break into the mindset of the everyday Australian.

Politicians have instead opted for an increase in the regressive GST as the only plausible option. Leading the charge was NSW Premier Mike Baird, who revealed during his pro-GST media blitz that households earning under $100,000 would need compensation. The tax churn was calculated at a staggering 60% deadweight cost for every dollar raised. With Treasury finding Land Taxes actually contributing 10% to the economy, the 70% differential demonstrates the cost of poor public education.

With Sydney housing prices topping $1 million and Melbourne now beyond $700,000, the need for clarity on what can appear a difficult concept has never been more important.

Economists brave the elements to discuss Land Tax as it acts as a counter-weight to mortgage debt. As a cost of ownership, market players incorporate future Land Taxes into their purchasing price. This saves thousands in mortgageinterest payments. Money thus saved can be spent locally, triggering employment in the productive economy. Governments also benefit in reduced costs of sprawl, lower poverty levels and greater small business creation. In short it encourages good behaviour whilst raising revenues - something no other tax can deliver.

However, holding charges on land such as local council rates and Land Taxes on a typicalMelbourne site have been hacked away to just $1,600 versus yearly capital gains of $95,000. Such lucrative returns have driven the speculative impulse behind half of all housing loans.

Local and state government have been caught in the middle by an out-dated tax system encouraging tax minimisation and a general public unable to decipher spin from self-interest. The failure of all levels of government to harness the rising value of property to solve problems is compounding quickly. Local democratic functions are being sacrificed under the weight of fiscal prudence.


Baird increased pressure for the amalgamation of local councils with the recent release of the IPART report 'Fit for the Future'. It found 63% of local councils unfit for the future. This is unsurprising as councils have endured twenty five years of limited revenue sovereignty enforced by poorly targeted rating caps. The Municipal Association of Victoria finds "NSW councils effectively spent only 55% of the average capital expenditure by local government in other states, leaving a multi-billion dollar black hole for future generations."

Despite this evidence, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews championed local council rate capping with the release of the Essential Services Commission rate-capping formula. An annual 60% CPI index with a 40% Wage Price Index is expected to slow the 6% average increase in rates over the last decade. Local councils have been forced into this situation by cutbacks at Federal and State levels with greater service obligations passed down the chain of government.

A rarely discussed budgetary pressure is the combined effect of 30 years of privatisation. Local traders in Maribyrnong complain at the $2,000 fee municipal contractors charge for cleaning one single drain. The world's largest privatised prison operator Serco runs the Melbourne City Council parks and gardens maintenance program - at what cost few know. The impact on government budgets of lavish consultancy fees must be more closely analysed. The privatisation agenda has effectively seen a few extra workers leaning on shovels replaced by executives on long Friday lunches.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

38 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Karl Fitzgerald is the Projects Coordinator for Earthsharing Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Karl Fitzgerald

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 38 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy