Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Singapore health system euthanises voodoo economics

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Monday, 9 November 2015


To protect against the risk of catastrophic illness which could wipe out their medical savings, Medisave account holders under 80 years of age may use their funds to buy Medishield insurance. This covers hospital expenses and selected higher-cost outpatient treatments. Other primary care costs (eg consultations and tests) are typically covered by top-up private insurance, which is very competitive. 

The third pillar of Singapore’s innovative system is Medifund, which provides means-tested health care for the poor (roughly 10% of the population). The Government established the fund in 1993 and makes additional contributions during years of overall budget surplus. Medifund ensures that no Singaporean is denied good basic care because of inability to pay. 

The difference is that Singapore’s health care system gives maximum responsibility and choice to patients, who are mostly spending their own money rather than that of other people. However, it also makes sure nobody faces catastrophic medical bills, and that the poor have enough money to buy medical care.

Advertisement

Voodoo economics have no place in public policy. With sensible policies, personal choice and individual responsibility can co-exist, without the Nanny State barging in and telling us all how to live.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy