Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Budget bills Generation AA

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 13 May 2015

The 2015 Federal Budget represents a capitulation by the government to the ALP and the Senate and builds a populist base for the next election.

Outlays are projected to be 25.9% of GDP, which is a similar level to that hit by Rudd after the GFC, Keating in the 90s and Fraser and Hawke in the early 80s. In fact it is well under the Hawke level.

But these other periods were periods of economic emergency. 1983, the first year of the Hawke government, was the worst recession since the Great Depression at that stage. In the early 90s Australia faced the “recession we had to have”.


But at this time the government is projecting reasonable GDP growth of above 2% and there is no economic crisis.

This means that permanently higher expenditures and therefore taxes, have been wired into the system.

It wasn’t where Abbott meant to be, but faced with the prospect of a reception like last year he has obviously opted for a politically palatable budget which doesn’t rock the boat.

At the same time, by giving a favourable tax treatment to smaller businesses it loads the dice a little in favour of greater employment growth and greater efficiency.

This, coupled with accelerated depreciation for amounts under $20,000, should rev the economy up in the next few years, helping to compensate for the ending of the mining boom.

But the budget still retains its booby traps far into the future in the shape of the NDIS, which is not means tested, and which continues to be deployed, and the unsustainability of our retirement system.


There has been some trimming of entitlements to the aged pension, which will hurt the Coalition’s base vote, with the asset taper being made twice as steep, meaning that people who have assets outside the family home will find it harder to get the pension.

But this doesn’t solve the problem as returns on assets are lower than they have historically been, meaning that these excluded Australians will have to sell assets to survive, so will come within the means test quickly enough.

By not touching the family home it also means that potential pensioners have an incentive to put all their assets into the home rather than assets which might be more productive for them, and also for the country.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy