Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Same but different: Bali Nine and children in detention

By Virginia Small - posted Monday, 2 March 2015


The notable feature of this coverage was that it depicted them as guilty, even before judgement. In the early stages we also had the Denpasar District Court described as a "kangaroo court".

Chan was: "the Godfather", to which Chan replied when asked by other news media: "Do I look the Godfather?". Media also described his as "mastermind" and "kingpin". Sukumaran was "the enforcer" and "martial arts expert" (he had taken a three months course once).

It was correct reporting for the media to quote Indonesian police at their arrests who described them as "Godfather" and "enforcer". But for the media to then perpetuate theses labels throughout the men's court trials and beyond as if they were accurate labels, was not. At best it was misleading, at worst unjust.

Advertisement

The media had set itself up as "the hanging judge" from the outset.

Chan and Sukumaran consistently described as "ringleaders" when clearly they were part of a much larger drug dealing operation that was run by the real "ringleaders". The media hyper-inflated their role from the start of reporting.

It was only this year that The Sydney Morning Herald said the use of these terms may have damaged Chan and Sukumaran's chances of a reprieve.

My research showed the media's choice of negative words and descriptors in framing these men has been potent, resonant and consistent.

It also shows how labels misrepresent and distort.

Interestingly, the growing groundswell of support for the men to be spared has coincided with the Australian media dropping these old labels. Voices are raised in protest at their punishment.

Advertisement

Media language has changed to "young men" and "organisers of a drug operation". We see photographs of them and their families and "the pair" is now "the Australians", or ameliorated to "Bali duo". They are being described (at last) as what they are.

Pejorative, hackneyed language, or words that are just plain wrong, have been perpetuated in media descriptions of those who seek asylum and at times it is even insinuated with terrorism.

Asylum-seekers (and by implication their children in detention) have ranged across a variety of damaging or incorrect terms including "queue jumpers", "illegals"/"illegal immigrants", "boat people", "by-passers of proper processes" and "detainees".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Virginia Small is a former ABC Broadcaster. Virginia has a PhD from Macquarie University and is researching the history and role of newspapers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Virginia Small

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy