Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Teaching trumps background

By Kevin Donnelly - posted Thursday, 29 January 2015


It is also increasingly evident that individual student ability, motivation and willingness to achieve success can ensure positive outcomes regardless of home background and whether parents are professionally educated or wealthy.

A 2003 ACER report highlights the importance of “motivation, perseverance, study habits, interest, enthusiasm and other factors over which students can exercise control” in explaining success at school.

The fact, compared to the majority of other OECD countries, that Australian students with a migrant, non-English speaking background have a better chance of outperforming students born here proves that ability and effort can overcome perceived disadvantage caused by home background.

Advertisement

Associated with the argument that home background determines educational success or failure is the mistaken belief that Australia’s education system is inequitable.  Critics argue that the existence of non-government schools reinforces disadvantage and social inequality.

Ignored, based on a number of OECD studies, is that Australia has a high degree of social mobility and one of the principal reasons is because of our education system.  As noted by Benjamin Herscovitich from the Centre for Independent Studies, “Australia is a fair go success story”.

Herscovotch goes on to conclude, “Australia has one of the highest rates or earnings and educational mobility in the industrialised world” and “the children whose parents did not finish secondary schooling are more likely to receive tertiary education in Australia than in other industrialised countries”.

And, as proven by the existence of academically successful, low-fee paying Catholic and non-denominational schools in many disadvantaged parts of the community, one reason why social mobility is high is because such schools are very effective in helping students achieve stronger educational outcomes than otherwise might be expected.

There is no doubt that more needs be done to strengthen learning outcomes and to raise standards but, ignoring the real reasons for under-performance denies any chance of improvement.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and he recently co-chaired the review of the Australian national curriculum. He can be contacted at kevind@netspace.net.au. He is author of Australia’s Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars available to purchase at www.edstandards.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Donnelly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Donnelly
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy