Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Can parliament work better?

By Ian Marsh - posted Friday, 16 January 2015


The move from expert to political assessment marks a critical step. At this point cross-bench, opposition, media, interest group and public opinion enters the equation. This now happens privately in Cabinet. A parliamentary enquiry would introduce a new and transparent phase. The committee enquiry would occur first. Cabinet could then deliberate with considerably more political intelligence about parliamentary and community attitudes. All protagonists would have engaged more deeply with rationales and options.

There would undoubtedly be some early 'ragged' experiences. In Australia's poisoned political atmosphere, a new approach to policy development could not be expected to attain instant success. The risks, which Ross Gittin's acknowledges above, are real. But what is the alternative? The present system is not delivering – not for Labor, not for the Coalition, not for cross benchers and least of all for the Australian people.

Why the Senate? The Senate is the right House to locate such enquiries. First, given the pluralised attitudes in the Australian community it is only by a fluke that any party will ever again have a majority in that Chamber. Second, this is how the Senate was conceived and indeed how it worked in Australia's three party period in the first decade after Federation. The Senate in effect acted as the agenda gatekeeper for emerging issues. This role changed when the two party system emerged in 1909.

Advertisement

Ultimately the committee system might evolve. The British committees work to a consensus rule. That used to be the case here. Why not try again? That's the way to start exploring potential for cross-party accommodations. The late David Hamer suggested many years ago that the Senate be converted to a Committee House – with Ministers and the executive drawn only from the Representatives. Committee chairs would then enjoy standing roughly equivalent to Ministers. All these are possible developments.

But the first step is to acknowledge that the present system is broken and narrative will not be a sufficient repair. The problem is quite different - it's ultimately caused by a slow-burn crisis of political legitimacy. It's time to explore another approach.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

An edited version of this article was published by the Australian Financial Review.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ian Marsh is Adjunct Professor, UTS Business School. He is the author, with Raymond Miller of Democratic Decline and Democratic Renewal: Political Change in Britain, Australia and New Zealand (Cambridge, 2012).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ian Marsh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ian Marsh
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy