While there is understandable attention on the region and the capacity
of terrorism to influence events, the doubter and the aloof among us, will
hear the dissentient voices within our own country.
They will hear the asylum seekers locked in inhumane conditions on the
stony ground out of Port Augusta. They will hear those who speak out
against the government’s attempts at blackmailing legislators who doubt
the wisdom of draconian anti-terrorist legislation being passed into law,
because they know that once we head down the road of intolerance and
repression, the terrorists have won.
They will hear the voices of those who are fined exorbitant sums of
money by Centrelink for being five minutes late for an interview, under
the judgemental mutual-obligation welfare policies that are now the
favourite tool for government to further divide our social cohesion by
creating the deserving versus the non-deserving poor.
Advertisement
They will listen to the thousands of decent Muslims who live in our
community, who share our values, and who as appalled at the acts of terror
committed in the name of that religion as we are – and they will
understand that the slaughter of millions, the dispossession of Indigenous
peoples, and the removal of young Indigenous people from their families
was all done in the name of another religion, Christianity.
They will question the relevance of symbols in 21st century
Australia such as a Queen as Head of State or a flag that reflects only
200 years of a nation’s history.
They will see headlines like ‘Courts soft on rapists’ and question
whether the ritual of an election-time law and order auction by political
parties and the tabloid media serves any purpose whatsoever in dealing
with the societal structures and conditions that lead to the commission of
crime.
And I could go on.
The point is that we have an obligation at times like the present, to
refuse to succumb to the majority simply for the sake of surrendering to
what Emile Zola called, "this sombre obstinacy of public
opinion".
When we are confronted by others who tell us that 'now is not the time'
to raise an issue, or that all you are doing is being divisive, then we
should reach again to into Hitchens’ marvellous Letters
to a Young Contrarian. He rightly urges a "long and risky
life" where "only an open conflict of ideas and principles can
produce any clarity". Conflict may be painful, but the painless
solution does not exist and the pursuit of it leads to the painful outcome
of mindlessness and pointlessness.
This is an edited version of an Occasional Address
given to Deakin University on 30 October 2002.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.