Are any changes to our force structure required in present
circumstances?
Yes, principally to increase the manpower, firepower, mobility and
sustainability of the Army. The old doctrine of focussing on territorial
defence led to over-concentration on the Airforce and Navy. Fighting
further out in space and time, including to uphold some governments and
changing others, cannot be done from air and sea alone. And the war on
terrorism requires additions to our capacity to contribute to military
activity overseas, including against "rogue states", as well as
bolstering our intelligence capabilities.
But no-one is talking about a huge expeditionary force, complete with
heavily armoured formations. Nor would we tackle a major enemy on our own.
Rather, we would act overseas with the USA; which puts a premium on
interoperability and niche-filling, not across-the-board capability.
Advertisement
Another reason for building up the Army is its central role in Rescue
Operations, ranging from Timor-like operations and other peacekeeping-type
tasks to assisting failing governments, for which are required boots on
the ground rather than massive firepower from air and sea.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
About the Author
Des Moore is Director, Institute for Private Enterprise and a former Deputy Secretary, Treasury. He authored Schooling Victorians, 1992, Institute of Public Affairs as part of the Project Victoria series which contributed to the educational and other reforms instituted by the Kennett Government. The views are his own.