After weeks of delay due to the wranglings of his legal camp, rugby player Kurtley Beale was recently found guilty of inappropriate public behaviour and sending abusive, sexually explicit text messages. Total fine $48,000. A fan-site poll suggested that 75% of fans were outraged that he wasn't punished more severely. The fan-rage escalated further when he was subsequently invited to participate in the Wallabies end of year European tour. Now he's been given a renewed contract with the ARU, again inviting the ire of the many who think he should have been summarily sacked.
Whether a fan or not, if you're the kind of person who is outraged by that kind of conduct, I suggest that you really ought not be surprised.
You shouldn't be surprised because, firstly, people will be people and, yes, boys will be boys. That's right, people, since time immemorial, have done the wrong thing. And men, in particular, have mistreated women. It's not an excuse. It's just a fact.
Advertisement
But is this happening more these days than before? Yeah, I think so. I started noticing a new level of sportsmen-behaving-badly in the era of League's Johns brothers and cricket's Shane Warne. Their success was ever-so-closely accompanied by multiple chapters of bad-boy behaviour: illegal betting, temper tantrums, racist slurs, improper texting, recreational drug abuse, drug-cheating, wife-cheating…
In Australia, the 90s, brought with it a new level of professionalism (read: much higher salaries) for our best sports stars. The goodness of greed, bound in the boardroom in the previous decade, had now hit the pitch. But this lethal delivery of economisation of the once sacred domain of sport and recreation, also came in an age with a new set of commonly accepted values.
And so the other reason you shouldn't be surprised by very naughty sporties is that contemporary culture feeds it. Cultural norms are determined by prevailing ideas.
Individualism is the idea that prizes individual choice. "I did what I wanted to do and I did it my way." Without considering the effect on others. Familiar? Yep: more than just the Sinatra mantra, it's the moral of the High School Musical kind of contributions to pop culture, and is the inherent life-chant of Gen Y.
It complements egocentrism, narcissism: excessive interest in oneself. Facebook. Yeah: that's prevailing.
And then there's my rights; which says "get stuffed" to authority or established standards of good and bad, because they impinge on my right to determine what's best for me. And who says what's good or bad anyway? Morality's relative.
Advertisement
These new favourites mix seamlessly with the stalwarts of objectification of women and the pride associated with wealth. And the results hit the news and cause outrage.
And so can we blame Kurtley, Paul Gallen, Todd Carney, the lads in the swim team, or the Essendon AFL club for their sins? Well, yes. No one would hold that the environment justifies the crime. Of course, they are responsible.
But what should we expect? What should we expect, when our culture worships them, tells them that the choice of the individual is the ultimate virtue, happily promotes objectification of women in and out of sport, gives them crazy amounts of cash and tells them that there's no such thing as right and wrong?
Dear reader, what should you expect? How ought one respond? Sadly, pessimism is a good start. People will be people. Sportsmen will get caught out in scandal again.
And yes, holding them to account via the tribunals and courts is a must. Some sense of justice will be served.
But a look at the larger picture, and the pervasiveness of these prevailing ideas of our culture, also invites some pity and forgiveness towards these blokes.
Oh for a vision of life with room for a right mix of both mercy towards such wayward ones; as well as a constructive picture of what true goodness looks like for a young talented Shane or Kurtley.
Elton John's ode to Marilyn Monroe, Candle in the Wind, laments how she was a victim of the watching world around her."they whispered into your brain;
they set you on the treadmill;
and they made you change your name
Next time you're revolted by the latest Shane-event, perhaps the revulsion might remind you that as custodians of the broader culture, we, the watching world are part of the problem.
Perhaps also, there is room to consider afresh the consequences of ideas. The ideas whispered into your (and everyone's) brain: individualism, sexism, egocentrism, economism, moral relativism. Reviling the ugly consequences of ideas is right. These consequences should cause outrage: the text messages, the drugs, the violence, the cheating. But let's not forget the ideas themselves that feed such consequences. Perhaps they have as much to answer for.