Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Victorian election was lukewarm all round

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 10 December 2014


Source: http://polling.newspoll.com.au.tmp.anchor.net.au/image_uploads/141124%20VIC%20Election%20-%20Final.pdf

The Victorian Liberals had already hit their lowest figure in October 2012, twelve months before Abbott won. There was a slight recovery when Napthine became leader, but this had mostly dissipated by the time Abbott became Prime Minister in September 2013.

Advertisement

There was a decline down to August this year, but it would be heroic to attribute all of this to Abbott when the problems with Geoff Shaw were raging throughout most of that time.

So, if there were an Abbott effect it is pretty hard to discern.

Another argument advanced is that the union base of the Labor Party ran a particularly effective door-knocking campaign in a number of seats, and this made the difference. According to former ALP State Secretary Nicholas Reece, they made 500,000 phone calls, door-knocked 170,000 homes with half the calls and a quarter of homes in 6 marginal seats.

I suspect Mr Reece is talking his book, because when you look at these marginal seats the swings are not out of the ordinary.

According to Antony Green, on the night the average swing to Labor on first preferences was 1.8%, so prima facie you need to do better than that to be able to claim a success. It turns out that of the 6 seats nominated, three do worse than the average swing, so we can say either that the campaign made no difference, or that the Liberals lifted to match it.

That leaves three seats where the unions may have had an effect, and the swings here were impressive – 3.4%, 6.0% and 8.0%. However, two were actually held by Labor, but notionally Liberal because of redistributions, and the other was held by Liberals, but also suffered a major redistribution.

Advertisement

So the results are really only large in seats where a new group of voters was up for grabs, and seem to rely heavily on incumbency in the first place. In two of the three it's just as likely that being the local member, with all the resources this entails, made the difference over a challenger. This table lists the seats.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/vic-election-2014/results/

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy