Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Victorian election was lukewarm all round

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 10 December 2014


Albeit by a small margin, and again with a large number of uncommitted voters.

So why did Napthine lose if he was the preferred premier, and electors were unenthusiastic about the parties?

Let's deal with some of the reasons advanced by commentators.

Advertisement

Jeff Kennett was quick to direct friendly fire at Abbott, and less friendly fire came from Chris Kenny in the SMH, Laurie Oakes, and others. The Labor Party implicitly appears to have agreed running election advertisements where the faces of Napthine and Abbott merged to become one.

But there is little evidence from our respondents that Abbott was a major reason. Only two people (out of 175) nominated him as the reason for voting against the state government.

Much more significant were alleged cuts to education and health, as well as cuts to TAFE. Other factors cited were lack of transparency around the East-West Link and a lack of investment in public transport, damage done to the environment, discomfit over the rate of development, privatisation and unemployment.

It's probable that Abbott played a part in negative perceptions on some of these issues as the problems at a federal level have damaged the Liberal brand and made it easier to paint it as the party that hates the poor.

For example, there was little factual justification for blaming the state government for cuts to health or education. While they had slowed the growth in spending in these areas to roughly the rate of inflation they had not been cut.

However, at a federal level the refusal of Abbott to extend Gonski and the previous Labor government's health funding arrangements, has been painted by Labor as broken promises and cuts in funding to education and health. So this may well have contributed to a belief amongst electors that the state Liberals had cut these services too.

Advertisement

But if he is taking some blame, it doesn't appear to be a particularly heavy load as demonstrated by these two tables from Newspoll's Victorian polling.

Source: http://polling.newspoll.com.au.tmp.anchor.net.au/image_uploads/130807%20VIC%20Voting%20Intention%20&%20Leaders%20Ratings%20Jul%20-%20Aug.pdf

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy