Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Funding scientific research: money can't buy love

By Allen Greer - posted Tuesday, 28 October 2014


In this plot, Australia is respectably above the trendline, but it is surpassed by six countries: United States, Great Britain, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland and Iceland, all in the OECD. If policy makers are interested in increasing the impact of their country's research beyond what increased collaboration can achieve, then scrutiny of the policy settings in these countries, especially the smaller ones such as Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands and Switzerland would be informative. Like R&D money allocated (above), the percent of international collaboration among institutions is amenable to policy changes.

And just to note, the amount spent on R&D (years 2009 + 2010) was inversely correlated with the percent of international collaboration among institutions (years 2003-2011; R = -37.6, N = 40, P< 0.02). This suggests actual policies affecting collaboration are more important that the sheer size of the R&D budget.

Finally, how much of the crème de la crème of impact does collaboration gain a country? When countries' percent of the top one percent of cited papers (van Noorden, 2012 for data.) is compared to their degree of collaboration (above) using the 32 available countries including 27 from the OECD, the best-fit trendline is a power function (Fig. 4) that accounts for 69 percent of the variance (a linear function differs only in the third decimal place).

Advertisement

Fig. 4. The percent of a county's papers in 2012 among the top one percent of papers cited for 32 countries, including 27 of the 34 OECD countries (Chile, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Slovakia omitted). Australia is shown in red.

Australia is above the trendline, but ten other countries clearly exceed it: USA, Czech Republic, Great Britain, Israel, South Africa, Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Belgium and Switzerland, all but one of which is in the OECD.

In policy terms, it looks as if collaboration helps the cream rise to the top.

In summary, in scientific research, money doesn't buy impact but collaboration does.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Allen Greer is a biologist who writes about science and nature.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Allen Greer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy