Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

No need to reject competition as a driving force in schooling outcomes

By David Robertson - posted Tuesday, 30 September 2014


· Ending the role of some service providers (government) as regulators;

· Placing all suppliers on a more level playing field in terms of funding and regulation; and

· Having transparency in relation to information concerning performance.

Advertisement

According to Gabriela Schütz and colleagues (School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Equity of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA, OECD Education, Working Paper No, 14, Paris: OECD 2007) there is evidence that "national features of accountability, autonomy, and choice are related to the equality of opportunity across countries".

In fact, the main empirical result of their research is that "rather than harming disadvantaged students, accountability, autonomy and choice appear to be tides that lift all boats. The additional choice created by public funding for private schools in particular is associated with a strong reduction in the dependence of student achievement on SES".

The options for reform are many, but at its heart an emphasis on quality has the potential to provide improved direction and policy coherence, promote efficiencies and make significant impacts on overall education performance in our classrooms.

The support for more competition in schooling as suggested by the Harper review might just provide the catalyst that is required.

The goals of the Queensland Plan are within reach if we embrace deregulation to a more "self-adjusting" model of policy development and service delivery and hence be more responsive to consumer demands.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Robertson is Executive Director of Independent Schools Queensland.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Robertson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Robertson
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy