Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A non-means tested, non-taxed government payment for all ought to be Tony Abbott's 'maxi' reform, and it should receive welfare lobby support

By Brian Frost - posted Thursday, 23 January 2003


a. Reduce the divide between the rich and the poor.
Besides the social benefits to be gained there is also a sound economic argument for this target. Today there is serious concern about the effects of globalisation and the danger of Australia becoming a 'branch office economy', and one of the matters of concern is the relatively small size of the domestic market with a population in the order of 19 million. For items other than the necessities of life, however, the domestic market is far less - possibly only half - because of the large and growing social stratification based on income. Reducing this stratification would help increase the size of the domestic market.

b. Provide a degree of financial security for all citizens not achievable with any other form of income support.
The unconditional nature of the income support will be of special benefit to the labour force and potential labour force. This will allow more workers to accept part-time or casual employment, thus helping to reduce the level of unemployment through a sharing of the available work. This will allow workers to plan for career training and development. And this will provide greater individual security when negotiating conditions of employment (described by some proponents as the empowerment of individuals).

c. Provide life long income security, which in turn will lead to questioning the role of occupational superannuation, and the responsibility of the state to provide taxation concessions for income related retirement incomes."

Advertisement

In closing the OASIS Newsletter, McDonald commented that "there is now at least one group with the interest and understanding to attempt to develop a basic income system for Australia, and to ensure that Australian social scientists maintain contact with international developments in this field."

Within the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) School of Humanities and Human Services a group to be known as the Basic Income Guarantee Australia (BIGA) will operate on the QUT web site, commencing in March 2003.

Development of the concept in Europe seems to be a soft-spoken, back-door approach while in countries such as South Africa and Brazil, where a lot has been happening lately, a more upbeat front-gate approach is happening.

The Irish government has published a green paper, the first major official publication on basic income in Europe since the 1985 report of the Dutch Scientific Council for Governmental Policy. South Africa's Basic Income Grant campaign has set a figure: 100 rands or 10 euros per month for every South African.

It is significant that the first Prime Minister (currently in office) to address a congress of BIEN was from Africa. In his speech at the opening plenary session, Mozambique's Prime Minister Pascoal Mocumbi stated that "the BIEN project, particularly the component that seeks to ensure a minimum income to guarantee school attendance, represents an innovative perspective which should be integrated into the national poverty reduction strategy".

Returning to the domestic situation, the Australians Working Together Bill will extend the notion of mutual obligation, and the risk of breach penalties, to a range of new groups: single parents, parents whose partners rely on social security, and older unemployed people.

Advertisement

This potentially punitive legislation gives rise to further urgency for reform of the current system.

The overhaul and eventual replacement of the present welfare system is not something that should be undertaken lightly or at great speed … but it must be undertaken, and soon.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brian Frost is a project officer at the Australia Pensioners and Supreannuants League, Queensland.

Related Links
Australian Pensioners and Supperannuants League
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy