Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Abbott, Obama and the new battle over climate agenda

By Benjamin Jones - posted Friday, 13 June 2014

As Tony Abbott prepares to meet Barack Obama for the first time as prime minister, the first shots of a new climate change battle have already been fired. The debate over climate change has been largely settled. 97 percent of climate scientists agree that human activity is driving warming trends. Despite infamously describing climate change as “absolute crap”, Tony Abbott now calls it a significant problem but “it’s not the only or even the most important problem the world faces”.

The new battle over climate change is as ideologically driven as the first one. Republicans in the United States and the Coalition in Australia have been sceptical of what they perceive to be radical environmentalism and the Green agenda. Conservative culture warrior Miranda Divine drew parallels between the Green movement and communism. Al Gore’s influential and divisive 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, noted that of all developed nations only the United States and Australia refused to ratify the 2001 Kyoto Protocol. This was a calculated ideological statement from George W. Bush and one John Howard was keen to support. 

If Howard and Bush were in ideological harmony, Obama and Abbott are near polar opposites in many crucial regards. Obama is looking to take major action on climate change and hopes it will be part of a global trend. He has recently announced an ambitious emissions reduction target of 30 percent by 2030 noting that “science is science”. Abbott could not be more different. He is politically committed to removing the unpopular price on carbon introduced by Julia Gillard. His recent stop in Ottawa was highly strategic as he flagged his ongoing opposition to a carbon price.


Abbott and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper have a similar political outlook. While Harper won re-election in 2008 campaigning against a price on carbon, Abbott won power in 2013 with a promise to repeal the existing Carbon Tax. Abbott was glowing in his rhetoric, describing Harper as “the exemplar of a contemporary, centre-right prime minister”. Harper was similarly full of praise, congratulating Abbott for his tough stance against “the job-killing carbon tax”.

Obama appeared in the final episode of Showtime’s Years of Living Dangerously arguing that climate change was a global problem requiring global solutions. He noted that beyond the immediate impact in the US, “these shifts can displace people - entire countries can be finding themselves unable to feed themselves and the potential incidence of conflict that arises out of that”. In contrast, Abbott and Harper have insisted that climate change is less important than job creation and the economy. Abbott insisted “we shouldn’t clobber the economy” with Harper agreeing, “No country is going to take actions that are going to deliberately destroy jobs and growth”.

Australia is the current chair of the G20 and will host a summit in Brisbane later in the year. Despite pressure from the US and Europe, Abbott has remained firm that climate change will not be on the official agenda. The global argument is crucial for Abbott as Australia is the only country in the world planning to remove, rather than implement, an emissions trading scheme. He claimed in Canada, “there is no sign - no sign - that trading schemes are increasingly being adopted. If anything trading schemes are being discarded, not adopted”.

While Obama and Abbott will meet as friends in Washington this week they are posturing in a high stakes political showdown. Obama has acknowledged that public opinion is key and wants to create the impression that the world is moving towards collective action and a carbon price. Abbott, whose political reputation is tied to opposing a carbon price, is desperate to undermine this impression. Together with Harper, he is seeking to form an alliance of conservative commonwealth leaders, including the United Kingdom, India and New Zealand to oppose any tough international measures.

Of the two leaders, Obama has far less to lose. Having secured a second term, he is now thinking about his presidential legacy. As the world’s largest economy and second largest emitter of carbon dioxide, he knows his reduction plan is historic and has the power to set a global trend.

Abbott, by contrast, is in his infancy as a world leader. Less than a year after his election, he is trailing badly in the polls and is struggling to sell a tough budget that included increased medical fees and reduced spending for health and education. Firm opposition to a carbon price was the stance that narrowly won him the leadership of his party in 2009 and the country in 2013. If he loses the domestic debate on pricing carbon it would be a political disaster.


The Australia-US alliance is important to Washington but absolutely crucial to Canberra. It has had bipartisan support in since World War II and is the sacred cow of Australian foreign policy. Obama and Abbott will both cordially emphasise the strength of the relationship. Despite the official niceties, the two men have already thrown the first punches in a divisive ideological battle with global ramifications. The battle over climate change being real may be over but a new front has clearly emerged. Is it important enough to warrant significant, global action.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

51 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Benjamin Thomas Jones is a Visiting Fellow at the Research School of Humanities and the Arts at the Australian National University. He has worked as a historian at the Museum of Australian Democracy and has taught at the University of Sydney and the ANU. Primarily interested in the development of democratic theory in the nineteenth century British world, his doctoral thesis explored the role of civic republicanism in colonial Australia and Canada. Benjamin has been published in leading history journals including Australian Historical Studies and the Journal of Australian Colonial History and has presented at several academic conferences. Benjamin publishes regular articles on history, politics and philosophy on his website ( and is currently co-editing a book on Australian republicanism with Mark McKenna which will be published in June 2013.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Benjamin Jones

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 51 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy