Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tiananmen Square 25 years one

By Keith Suter - posted Wednesday, 4 June 2014


The Chinese communists retain power by holding onto the political reins of power, including censoring Internet references to the Tiananmen massacre.

But they do not now attempt the broad sweep of social and economic control that Moscow attempted. Their civilizational mission is not as aggressive as the Soviet one. They do not pretend they are creating an alternative vision for society that will be an example to the rest of the world. They certainly want to undo what they see as the tragedy of the previous two centuries or so under imperial domination, and so wish to redraw their boundaries (hence the territorial disputes).

But they have no ambition for the rest of the world to emulate Chinese communist culture. Other countries are to welcome to have whatever lifestyle they want.

Advertisement

Chinese communists want to make trade – not war. A visit to Chinese cities show they have (for the wealthy anyway) a taste for international consumer goods. Some of the best markets for European and American luxury goods are now in China.

A few Chinese may be interested in political freedom and having a say in how the country is governed. But most people cannot be bothered. They are concerned about corruption (alas not exclusively a Chinese problem) and they have no great love for their politicians.

But as long as the material standard of living continues to improve and there is a steady flow of consumer goods, most people are satisfied. As long as the political system delivers economic growth, they are not too fussed about the political system.

There is greater social liberty in China than there was behind the Iron Curtain. People are free to make money and spend it as they wish – providing they do not try to disrupt the political system.

This may not seem a particularly elevated view of humankind. But as Solzhenitsyn found, most people want consumer goods and entertainment and not be bothered with the complexities of politics, let alone revolution.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Keith Suter is a futurist, thought leader and media personality in the areas of social policy and foreign affairs. He is a prolific and well-respected writer and social commentator appearing on radio and television most weeks.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keith Suter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Keith Suter
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy